<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Collection: Monographica: Diritto e interpretazione: prospettive, analisi e problemi / On Law and Interpretation: perspectives, analysis and problems</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5301" />
  <subtitle>Monographica: Diritto e interpretazione: prospettive, analisi e problemi / On Law and Interpretation: perspectives, analysis and problems</subtitle>
  <id>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5301</id>
  <updated>2013-05-24T01:30:58Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2013-05-24T01:30:58Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Etica &amp; Politica / Ethics &amp; Politics</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5347" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5347</id>
    <updated>2011-09-29T11:52:48Z</updated>
    <published>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Etica &amp; Politica / Ethics &amp; Politics
Type: Fascicolo rivista</summary>
    <dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Rise (and Fall?) of Normative Ethics. A Critical notice of Sergio Cremaschi’s L’etica del Novecento</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5335" />
    <author>
      <name>De Grandis, Giovanni</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5335</id>
    <updated>2012-01-25T10:25:06Z</updated>
    <published>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The Rise (and Fall?) of Normative Ethics. A Critical notice of Sergio Cremaschi’s L’etica del Novecento
Authors: De Grandis, Giovanni
Abstract: Sergio Cremaschi’s L’etica del Novecento offers a clear and careful account of the development&#xD;
of ethical theory in English-language and German Philosophy. The focus on meta-ethics and&#xD;
normative concerns allows the author to offer a very concise, reliable and comprehensive&#xD;
overview of philosophical ethics. In this respect the book effectively fills the gap left by the&#xD;
lack of a good, updated history of ethics. Although those qualities establish Cremaschi’s work&#xD;
as a valuable reference book, a few doubts are raised about the highly theoretical approach&#xD;
adopted. On the one hand this choice proves not to be very hospitable to some traditions&#xD;
(like most of French philosophy, Marxism, Virtue ethics etc.) and overlooks the connections&#xD;
between ethics and the socio-historical world, with the effect of giving a picture of moral&#xD;
philosophy as a very abstract and academic discipline. On the other hand it is not clear&#xD;
whether the emergence of applied ethics is to be greeted as the culmination of the resurgence&#xD;
of normative ethics, or whether it is conspiring with other trends to undermine the whole&#xD;
enterprise of constructing normative theories. If, as I suspect, the latter is the case, the moral&#xD;
of Cremaschi’s narrative may be different from the one he suggests.
Type: Articolo</summary>
    <dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>John Rawls: anti-foundationalism, deliberative democracy, and cosmopolitanism</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5334" />
    <author>
      <name>Trifirò, Fabrizio</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5334</id>
    <updated>2012-04-26T06:36:55Z</updated>
    <published>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: John Rawls: anti-foundationalism, deliberative democracy, and cosmopolitanism
Authors: Trifirò, Fabrizio
Abstract: This paper aims at illustrating how from the works of John Rawls we can see emerging a&#xD;
viable anti-foundationalist cosmopolitan and deliberative democratic approach to liberalism.&#xD;
I shall argue that, despite what some of his critics believe, Rawls’s liberal theory of justice (1)&#xD;
is not concerned with foundational preoccupations (e.g. Michael Sandel); (2) does not ignore&#xD;
concrete processes of collective deliberation over matters of public interests (e.g. Amy&#xD;
Guttman, Dennis Thomson, Brian Barry); (3) nor does it endorse rigid limits to the scope of&#xD;
democratic deliberation (e.g. Jeremy Waldron, John Gray, Richard Bellamy). Yet I shall&#xD;
claim, following Andrew Kuper, that (4) there is a real risk of infringing individuals’ primary&#xD;
moral significance in trying to stretch too much the limits of liberal toleration in order to&#xD;
accommodate political liberalism with multiculturalism in the international sphere.
Type: Articolo</summary>
    <dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Che cosa resta della spiegazione. Un commento a Donatelli</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5333" />
    <author>
      <name>Marrone, Pierpaolo</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5333</id>
    <updated>2012-01-25T10:22:54Z</updated>
    <published>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Che cosa resta della spiegazione. Un commento a Donatelli
Authors: Marrone, Pierpaolo
Type: Articolo</summary>
    <dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

