<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5916" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5916</id>
  <updated>2013-06-19T07:52:34Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2013-06-19T07:52:34Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Competition in public transport in Great Britain</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5923" />
    <author>
      <name>White, Peter</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5923</id>
    <updated>2012-02-09T00:34:24Z</updated>
    <published>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Competition in public transport in Great Britain
Authors: White, Peter
Abstract: Britain offers a case in which much greater experience of competition in the public transport sector can&#xD;
be seen than in other European countries. Examples are drawn from this experience, showing that&#xD;
outcomes differ between the long-distance and local markets, price competition functioning much more&#xD;
effectively in the former. In many respects, the competitive bidding process may be seen as more&#xD;
important and extensive than direct ‘on the road’ inter-operator competition within the same mode over&#xD;
the same routes. Experiences from competitive tendering and franchising are reviewed. Contradictions&#xD;
between competition policy and wider transport policies remain to be resolved.
Type: Articolo</summary>
    <dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Franchising of Melbourne’s rail services: assessment after six years</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5922" />
    <author>
      <name>Stanley, John</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5922</id>
    <updated>2012-02-09T00:34:23Z</updated>
    <published>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Franchising of Melbourne’s rail services: assessment after six years
Authors: Stanley, John
Abstract: This article reviews the recent experience of franchising metropolitan public transport services in&#xD;
Melbourne, Australia, to assess the extent to which the declared objectives of the franchising have been&#xD;
achieved. The failure of the initial franchise process is argued to be attributable, in significant part, to&#xD;
shortcomings in the Government’s understanding of what was achievable from a public-private initiative&#xD;
of this nature, given the Melbourne context. Developments associated with the re-franchising process are&#xD;
summarised, the emphasis shifting towards a strong partnership relationship between purchaser and&#xD;
provider, with a more realistic risk allocation between the two.
Type: Articolo</summary>
    <dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>To bid or not to bid, this is the question: the Italian experience in competitive tendering for local bus services</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5921" />
    <author>
      <name>Boitani, Andrea</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Cambini, Carlo</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5921</id>
    <updated>2012-02-09T00:34:27Z</updated>
    <published>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: To bid or not to bid, this is the question: the Italian experience in competitive tendering for local bus services
Authors: Boitani, Andrea; Cambini, Carlo
Abstract: Competitive tendering is a popular mechanism for the provision of local bus services when a major&#xD;
objective is subsidy savings. Despite uncertainties in the legal framework some competitive tendering&#xD;
was implemented in Italy since 1998. The evidence so far is that participants were limited in number, the&#xD;
incumbents were almost everywhere able to gain the franchise, whilst subsidy savings were in many cases&#xD;
negligible. If some “political” conditions favouring more effective tendering procedures are not fulfilled,&#xD;
other regimes should be considered in order to obtain substantial subsidy savings.
Type: Articolo</summary>
    <dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Norwegian experiences with tendered buss services</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5920" />
    <author>
      <name>Bekken, Jon-Terje</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Longva, Frode</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Fearnley, Nils</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Osland, Oddgeir</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5920</id>
    <updated>2012-02-09T00:34:25Z</updated>
    <published>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Norwegian experiences with tendered buss services
Authors: Bekken, Jon-Terje; Longva, Frode; Fearnley, Nils; Osland, Oddgeir
Abstract: Competitive tendering of local public transport services has been allowed in Norway since 1994. By&#xD;
2005, 28 percent of all route production in Norway was procured on the basis of tendered contracts,&#xD;
covering around 40 percent of all passengers. The majority of the tendered contracts were gross cost&#xD;
contracts, whereas historically, most Norwegian contracts have been net cost contracts. This article&#xD;
analyses the effect of competitive tendering on operating cost and subsidies paid. It is found that&#xD;
competitive tendering reduces costs by 10 percent and that most of the cost reduction has been used to&#xD;
reduce subsidies for public transport by local authorities. The effects of competitive tendering in Norway&#xD;
are smaller compared to other countries. This can be attributed to the fact that the industry had improved&#xD;
efficiency over a long period before competitive tendering was introduced.
Type: Articolo</summary>
    <dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

