<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/6095" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/6095</id>
  <updated>2013-05-21T20:38:55Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2013-05-21T20:38:55Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>European Transport / Trasporti Europei</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/6140" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/6140</id>
    <updated>2012-03-16T00:33:19Z</updated>
    <published>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: European Transport / Trasporti Europei
Type: Fascicolo rivista</summary>
    <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Effect of imperfect competition on infrastructure charges</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/6138" />
    <author>
      <name>Meunier, David</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Quinet, Emile</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/6138</id>
    <updated>2012-03-15T00:35:07Z</updated>
    <published>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Effect of imperfect competition on infrastructure charges
Authors: Meunier, David; Quinet, Emile
Abstract: The text explores the optimal infrastructure charges of an unbundled activity where the infrastructure&#xD;
manager sells the use of the infrastructure to operators providing services to a downstream market made&#xD;
up of atomistic customers. This situation has been widely analysed under the assumption that the&#xD;
upstream market is competitive, but more rarely in the case of imperfect competition. Typical examples&#xD;
are the railways activity in Europe and air transport. Various market structures are considered, illustrated&#xD;
by situations encountered in the transport field: a single mode operated by a single operator, two operators&#xD;
competing within the same mode, and two modes competing in a Bertrand way. In each case, situations&#xD;
are analysed using analytic formulae with a simplified demand function and a simplified cost function,&#xD;
and performing simulations with sensible parameter values drawn from current average situations. The&#xD;
main result is that the analysed imperfections make a dramatic departure from the conventional Marginal&#xD;
Cost pricing doctrine. Conclusions are drawn regarding infrastructure charging policy.
Type: Articolo</summary>
    <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Impacts and incentives of differentiated rail infrastructure charges in Europe - focus on freight</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/6137" />
    <author>
      <name>Matthews, Bryan</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Evangelinos, Christos</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Johnson, Daniel</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Meunier, David</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/6137</id>
    <updated>2012-03-21T10:13:03Z</updated>
    <published>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Impacts and incentives of differentiated rail infrastructure charges in Europe - focus on freight
Authors: Matthews, Bryan; Evangelinos, Christos; Johnson, Daniel; Meunier, David
Abstract: One of the key objectives of rail infrastructure charges has been stated as being to promote the efficient&#xD;
use of the infrastructure. Much effort has been put into the derivation of charging regimes by&#xD;
infrastructure managers and regulators throughout Europe, and a mix of differing regimes have been put&#xD;
in place. However, relatively little work has been undertaken to examine the impacts and incentivisation&#xD;
effects that these charging regimes produce. This paper gives consideration to relevant theory in this area,&#xD;
what one might expect - from first principles - and then reports on a number of interviews and case&#xD;
studies undertaken to explore these impacts and incentives. Finally, it discusses a number of&#xD;
methodological issues surrounding this area of research, and proposes further lines of enquiry that might&#xD;
reasonably be pursued.
Type: Articolo</summary>
    <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Co-introduction of charges on urban roads and motorways in metropolitan areas: a model-based investigation</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/6136" />
    <author>
      <name>Bonsall, Peter</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Maher, Mike</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/6136</id>
    <updated>2012-03-15T00:34:13Z</updated>
    <published>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Co-introduction of charges on urban roads and motorways in metropolitan areas: a model-based investigation
Authors: Bonsall, Peter; Maher, Mike
Abstract: This paper explores the relationship between charges on motorways and on other types of road. It&#xD;
draws on a model-based study of different pricing scenarios which was conducted within an EU-funded&#xD;
investigation of differentiated infrastructure charges (the DIFFERENT project). The scenarios covered&#xD;
strategies ranging from full charging on all roads irrespective of category, on motorways only, on&#xD;
motorway access roads, on urban roads only, and at cordons. A number of different charge levels were&#xD;
tested. The test results suggested that positive impacts and revenues are maximised by applying charges&#xD;
to each link which reflect the contribution to externalities made by the marginal user of that link -&#xD;
irrespective of whether it is a motorway link or an urban link. However, when implementation costs are&#xD;
taken into account, the best performing scheme was a cordon charge combined with a per-km charge for&#xD;
use of motorways outside the cordon. Fixed per-km charges on motorways or on urban roads are much&#xD;
less effective than charges which are differentiated to reflect congestion on individual links. The&#xD;
introduction of charges only on motorways produces little benefit and causes unwanted diversion to urban&#xD;
roads, and although the introduction of a charge designed to protect the level of service enjoyed by&#xD;
strategic motorway traffic succeeds in achieving that goal, it yields little revenue and has little overall&#xD;
impact on delay or other externalities. The paper highlights the practical implications of these results and&#xD;
notes that, although it is likely to be easier to gain political support for introducing charges on motorways&#xD;
than on other types of road, the benefits from so doing are generally lower than can be obtained by&#xD;
introducing charges on congested urban roads.
Type: Articolo</summary>
    <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

