<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5618">
    <title>DSpace Collection: Monographica: The Paths of the Alien: on the Philosophy of Bernhard Waldenfels</title>
    <link>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5618</link>
    <description>Monographica: The Paths of the Alien: on the Philosophy of Bernhard Waldenfels</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5676" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5668" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5667" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5665" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2013-05-18T22:09:55Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5676">
    <title>Etica &amp; Politica / Ethics &amp; Politics</title>
    <link>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5676</link>
    <description>Title: Etica &amp; Politica / Ethics &amp; Politics
Type: Fascicolo rivista</description>
    <dc:date>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5668">
    <title>La sovranità dell’Idea del Bene: Iris Murdoch con Platone</title>
    <link>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5668</link>
    <description>Title: La sovranità dell’Idea del Bene: Iris Murdoch con Platone
Authors: Fanciullacci, Riccardo
Abstract: The philosophical work of Iris Murdoch, although not so extensive, cannot be easily grasped through usual classifications. Here we suggest approaching it from the perspective of Moore’s thesis on the indefinable nature of good that she endorsed after having re-examined it. This comparison with Moore, however, is part of a more general and deeper investigation on the platonic Idea of the Good itself. Thus, after having analyzed how Murdoch understood and assessed the transition from Moore’s conception to the contemporary framework shared by emotivism and R. Hare’s prescriptivism, we clarify the idea of the sovereignty of good by emphasizing the following three aspects: the link between the realm of good and the authority of truth; the unifying power of the idea of good, in regard to reality as we experience it in our lives; lastly, the way in which this idea enables us to transcend the limits of our inherited theoretical horizons, thus revealing the true nature of human freedom.
Type: Articolo</description>
    <dc:date>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5667">
    <title>I limiti del consenso tra sfere valoriali alternative</title>
    <link>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5667</link>
    <description>Title: I limiti del consenso tra sfere valoriali alternative
Authors: Mori, Luca
Abstract: The aim of this paper is to discuss the possibility to find a shared basis of agreement among comprehensive religious doctrines, when actors neither agree about which goals are reasonable nor think that a cooperative behaviour is worthy. Taking into account recent case studies, I will compare two of the most influential theories about consensus: Habermas’s position about “reaching understanding” and Rawls’s model of “overlapping consensus”. Whereas several well known political theories about consensus seem to reside at a distance from the world, failing to place normative claims within historical contexts, Max Weber argues that opposed value’s spheres interlace because of the “superficiality” of quotidian life. The still open problem pertains to conditions for political consensus and justice when there is no reason to expect that religious individuals and organizations will converge in their views on what constitutes a just way of life and on where are the reasonable limits of reciprocity to be drawn.
Type: Articolo</description>
    <dc:date>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5665">
    <title>Questioni di consenso</title>
    <link>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5665</link>
    <description>Title: Questioni di consenso
Authors: Marrone, Pierpaolo
Abstract: After recalling the Lockean doctrine of tacit consent and Hume’s criticisms to contractualistic theories, I propose a method for the selection of rulers.
Type: Articolo</description>
    <dc:date>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

