<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5777">
    <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
    <link>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5777</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5789" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5788" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5787" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5786" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2013-05-24T13:28:57Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5789">
    <title>European Transport / Trasporti Europei</title>
    <link>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5789</link>
    <description>Title: European Transport / Trasporti Europei
Type: Fascicolo rivista</description>
    <dc:date>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5788">
    <title>The importance of stakeholder analysis in freight transport</title>
    <link>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5788</link>
    <description>Title: The importance of stakeholder analysis in freight transport
Authors: Macharis, Cathy
Abstract: In this paper the multi actor, multi criteria analysis method or in short the MAMCA method is&#xD;
presented for the evaluation of transport project. In this method stakeholders are explicitly taken into&#xD;
account which is very important in the freight transport sector. Starting from an overview of evaluation&#xD;
methods, the paper comes to the integrated MAMCA approach. Several applications of this method are&#xD;
discussed.
Type: Articolo</description>
    <dc:date>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5787">
    <title>The shipper’s perspective on distance and time and the operator (intermodal goods transport) response</title>
    <link>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5787</link>
    <description>Title: The shipper’s perspective on distance and time and the operator (intermodal goods transport) response
Authors: Kreutzberger, Ekki
Abstract: This paper is about distance and time in alternative bundling networks and roundtrip models. First the&#xD;
relevance of transport costs and time for customers of intermodal transport is reviewed. Then the paper&#xD;
focuses on vehicle roundtrip design in European intermodal rail networks and the perspectives to&#xD;
accelerate roundtrip speed. Acceleration often implies an increase of service frequency. As transport&#xD;
volumes often will not justify higher frequencies, the introduction of so-called complex bundling (e.g.&#xD;
hub-and-spoke or line services) may be an outcome. Complex bundling allows applying a relative large&#xD;
vehicle scale, despite of restricted flow sizes. This cost advantage is likely to overrule the cost&#xD;
disadvantage of longer routes in complex bundling networks. An important indication for this fact is a&#xD;
comparison of total network distances and times. The last part of the paper compares the distances and&#xD;
times of about 150 networks (different bundling concepts and network geometries). It shows that the&#xD;
additional length of routes of complex bundling networks is always overruled by the distance and time&#xD;
impact of a lower number of connections between begin- and end terminals in complex bundling&#xD;
networks
Type: Articolo</description>
    <dc:date>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5786">
    <title>The feasibility of mega container vessels</title>
    <link>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5786</link>
    <description>Title: The feasibility of mega container vessels
Authors: van Ham, Johannes Cornelius
Abstract: The introduction of the container revolutionised maritime trade and shipping. Since 1956 container&#xD;
vessels have evolved from converted tankers and cargo ships, via full cellular container ships that could&#xD;
navigate the Panama Canal, to post-Panamax vessels with a capacity of approx. 8500 TEU (Twenty foot&#xD;
Equivalent Unit). Even bigger container ships (9600 TEU) are to be delivered soon. However, current&#xD;
technical and physical constraints such as propulsion and port limitations pose restrictions to further&#xD;
growth. Moreover, the diminishing economies of scale in ship costs are offset by the increase of other&#xD;
costs involved (e.g. port fees, terminal handling charges). Nevertheless, empirical research shows that the&#xD;
concept of mega container vessels is appealing and that, if available, most shipping lines will deploy such&#xD;
ships. So, the next generation container ships will probably consist of Suez-max vessels (up to 12,500&#xD;
TEU) with twin propulsion systems. Albeit feasible from a technical point of view the ultimate 18,000&#xD;
TEU container ship i.e. Mallaca-max has too many limitations to become popular.
Type: Articolo</description>
    <dc:date>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

