<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Community:</title>
    <link>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/4673</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:54:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2013-05-22T22:54:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Etica &amp; Politica / Ethics &amp; Politics</title>
      <link>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/8231</link>
      <description>Title: Etica &amp; Politica / Ethics &amp; Politics
Type: Fascicolo rivista</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/8231</guid>
      <dc:date>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Political Liberalism, Natural Duty of Justice and Moral Duty of Civility</title>
      <link>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/8230</link>
      <description>Title: Political Liberalism, Natural Duty of Justice and Moral Duty of Civility
Authors: Zelić, Nebojša
Abstract: In this paper I present a relation between two principles on individuals that John Rawls presented in his two major works. First one is natural duty of justice in A Theory of Justice and second one is moral duty of civility in Political Liberalism. I start with the claim that natural duty of justice is the best answer to the problem of legitimacy of liberal institutions posed by A. John Simmons. But, in the circumstances of reasonable pluralism it is not clear how can such a vague duty guide us in political reasoning. That is why I claim that moral duty of civility, which demands that we respect boundaries of public reason, is the way how we fulfill our natural duty of justice in circumstances of reasonable pluralism. This implies that moral duty of civility has its moral grounding in natural duty of justice. Then I try to present how this view can answer to some objections raised against the idea of public reason and also how it can refers to some problems of distributive justice.
Type: Articolo</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/8230</guid>
      <dc:date>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Logical Varieties of Instrumental Reasons</title>
      <link>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/8229</link>
      <description>Title: Logical Varieties of Instrumental Reasons
Authors: Spielthenner, Georg
Abstract: Instrumental reasons play a central role in our practical deliberations because we apply the distinction between reasonable and unreasonable not only to beliefs, but to actions also. The question of what one has an instrumental reason to do is an important substantive question that is relevant to the general theory of practical reasoning and to ethics, too. It will be my object in the present study to show that we have different kinds of instrumental reasons, which depend solely on their logical structure. To this end, I shall in the first section deal with the validity of instrumental reasoning in general. In the remainder of the paper I outline five types of instrumental reasons and show how they depend on their logical structure. In so doing, I hope to shed some light on the concept of instrumental reasons, which is not well understood.
Type: Articolo</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/8229</guid>
      <dc:date>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dopo la trincea: Gramsci, “L’Ordine Nuovo” e la rivoluzione italiana</title>
      <link>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/8228</link>
      <description>Title: Dopo la trincea: Gramsci, “L’Ordine Nuovo” e la rivoluzione italiana
Authors: Silvestrini, Flavio
Abstract: Through the articles written by Antonio Gramsci during the first year and a half of release of “L’Ordine Nuovo”, you can see the development lines of what the author has established during the World War I on the historical and political analysis of Italian and European society. These ideas deal directly with Factory Council’s doctrine: Gramsci, inspired by the voluntary initia-tives in Turin factories, builds, since the summer of 1919, a revolutionary theory gathered on the role of working-class institutions. The extensive task of the Factory, in a devastated post-war industrial society, forces the political thinker to reshape the traditional functions of the two representative proletarian institutions: Labor Union and Political Party. Only rethinking about how they work, it’s possible to lead to success the revolutionary movement of the most aware Italian workers: from Turin industries can arise the future construction of Italian Soviet repub-lic that, after the victory of the Revolution in all countries, will be melted in international communist society. This theory stands in a particular position between socialist thinkers of that period, not only towards Reformists or Unitarians Maximalists, but also towards elements of the Communist faction that breaks up with the PSI during national congress of Livorno (Janu-ary 1921) to create a new revolutionary Party.
Type: Articolo</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/8228</guid>
      <dc:date>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

