<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Collection: Monographica: Philosophical Anthropology: Historical Perspectives</title>
    <link>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5097</link>
    <description>Monographica: Philosophical Anthropology: Historical Perspectives</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:50:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2013-05-22T05:50:31Z</dc:date>
    
    <item>
      <title>Etica &amp; Politica / Ethics &amp; Politics</title>
      <link>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5121</link>
      <description>Title: Etica &amp; Politica / Ethics &amp; Politics
Type: Fascicolo rivista</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5121</guid>
      <dc:date>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Identidad sin sujeto: Arendt y el mutuo reconocimiento</title>
      <link>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5120</link>
      <description>Title: Identidad sin sujeto: Arendt y el mutuo reconocimiento
Authors: Quintana, Laura
Abstract: This article discusses whether, from Hannah Arendt’s point of view, the being-in-common of singularities&#xD;
can be conceived in terms of mutual recognition. Although it is shown that Arendt’s&#xD;
theory of action involves the idea that the identity of singularities is relational, it is also stressed&#xD;
that it is a fluid identity, thrown into contingency. Therefore, it is not a more solid self consciousness&#xD;
what individuals achieve when they open themselves to each other and when they&#xD;
recognize themselves in their difference. What they achieve is to be exposed to the fact of coexistence,&#xD;
to an experience of plurality in which others are more than just a mirror in which they&#xD;
recognize and affirm themselves.
Type: Articolo</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5120</guid>
      <dc:date>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Contrattualismo morale e intellettualismo etico in T. Scanlon</title>
      <link>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5119</link>
      <description>Title: Contrattualismo morale e intellettualismo etico in T. Scanlon
Authors: Marrone, Pierpaolo
Abstract: This paper deals with the major concepts of Scanlon’s moral contractualism. It is&#xD;
possible to describe moral contractualism as the ability to identify priorities and&#xD;
moral reasons in deliberative action, that no one could reasonably reject. These&#xD;
capabilities require us to take into account the interests of others in our moral&#xD;
judgments. The result is that Scanlon overthrow the philosophy of Hobbes: morality&#xD;
is not originated from politics; on the contrary, politics is a function of morality. His&#xD;
answer to the dilemma of Prichard is particularly persuasive, though the proof of the&#xD;
falsity of the skeptical position can only be dialectic and persuasive is its&#xD;
intellectualistic position on relations between reasons and desires, too.
Type: Articolo</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5119</guid>
      <dc:date>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ethics and Monetary Theory: Is There a Common Middle Ground?</title>
      <link>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5118</link>
      <description>Title: Ethics and Monetary Theory: Is There a Common Middle Ground?
Authors: Howden, David
Abstract: The current bust has brought a boom to at least one area: the subject of business&#xD;
ethics. While ethics in the general business realm is hotly debated, the monetary sphere&#xD;
is woefully neglected. Jörg Guido Hülsmann’s (2009) The Ethics of Money Production&#xD;
has revived interest in applying an ethical foundation to monetary theory – specifically,&#xD;
bouts of inflation. Given that Central Banks – those institutions entrusted with the&#xD;
control and issuance of a country’s currency – regularly “earn” profits far in excess of&#xD;
what conventional deposit banks report, an ethical assessment is in order. Pushing&#xD;
economics back to its original position as a “moral science” is a welcome move.&#xD;
Monetary economics may be the area most in need of this shift, and will yield the&#xD;
greatest advancements when it is finally achieved.
Type: Articolo</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5118</guid>
      <dc:date>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

