<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Collection: Monographica: Diritto e interpretazione: prospettive, analisi e problemi / On Law and Interpretation: perspectives, analysis and problems</title>
    <link>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5301</link>
    <description>Monographica: Diritto e interpretazione: prospettive, analisi e problemi / On Law and Interpretation: perspectives, analysis and problems</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 10:53:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2013-05-18T10:53:55Z</dc:date>
    
    <item>
      <title>Etica &amp; Politica / Ethics &amp; Politics</title>
      <link>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5347</link>
      <description>Title: Etica &amp; Politica / Ethics &amp; Politics
Type: Fascicolo rivista</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5347</guid>
      <dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Rise (and Fall?) of Normative Ethics. A Critical notice of Sergio Cremaschi’s L’etica del Novecento</title>
      <link>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5335</link>
      <description>Title: The Rise (and Fall?) of Normative Ethics. A Critical notice of Sergio Cremaschi’s L’etica del Novecento
Authors: De Grandis, Giovanni
Abstract: Sergio Cremaschi’s L’etica del Novecento offers a clear and careful account of the development&#xD;
of ethical theory in English-language and German Philosophy. The focus on meta-ethics and&#xD;
normative concerns allows the author to offer a very concise, reliable and comprehensive&#xD;
overview of philosophical ethics. In this respect the book effectively fills the gap left by the&#xD;
lack of a good, updated history of ethics. Although those qualities establish Cremaschi’s work&#xD;
as a valuable reference book, a few doubts are raised about the highly theoretical approach&#xD;
adopted. On the one hand this choice proves not to be very hospitable to some traditions&#xD;
(like most of French philosophy, Marxism, Virtue ethics etc.) and overlooks the connections&#xD;
between ethics and the socio-historical world, with the effect of giving a picture of moral&#xD;
philosophy as a very abstract and academic discipline. On the other hand it is not clear&#xD;
whether the emergence of applied ethics is to be greeted as the culmination of the resurgence&#xD;
of normative ethics, or whether it is conspiring with other trends to undermine the whole&#xD;
enterprise of constructing normative theories. If, as I suspect, the latter is the case, the moral&#xD;
of Cremaschi’s narrative may be different from the one he suggests.
Type: Articolo</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5335</guid>
      <dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>John Rawls: anti-foundationalism, deliberative democracy, and cosmopolitanism</title>
      <link>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5334</link>
      <description>Title: John Rawls: anti-foundationalism, deliberative democracy, and cosmopolitanism
Authors: Trifirò, Fabrizio
Abstract: This paper aims at illustrating how from the works of John Rawls we can see emerging a&#xD;
viable anti-foundationalist cosmopolitan and deliberative democratic approach to liberalism.&#xD;
I shall argue that, despite what some of his critics believe, Rawls’s liberal theory of justice (1)&#xD;
is not concerned with foundational preoccupations (e.g. Michael Sandel); (2) does not ignore&#xD;
concrete processes of collective deliberation over matters of public interests (e.g. Amy&#xD;
Guttman, Dennis Thomson, Brian Barry); (3) nor does it endorse rigid limits to the scope of&#xD;
democratic deliberation (e.g. Jeremy Waldron, John Gray, Richard Bellamy). Yet I shall&#xD;
claim, following Andrew Kuper, that (4) there is a real risk of infringing individuals’ primary&#xD;
moral significance in trying to stretch too much the limits of liberal toleration in order to&#xD;
accommodate political liberalism with multiculturalism in the international sphere.
Type: Articolo</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5334</guid>
      <dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Che cosa resta della spiegazione. Un commento a Donatelli</title>
      <link>http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5333</link>
      <description>Title: Che cosa resta della spiegazione. Un commento a Donatelli
Authors: Marrone, Pierpaolo
Type: Articolo</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openstarts.units.it:80/dspace/handle/10077/5333</guid>
      <dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

