OpenstarTs >
EUT-Periodici >
Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics >
Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2010) XII/1 >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10077/4676

Title: Saving Pragmatist Democratic Theory (from Itself)
Authors: Talisse, Robert
Keywords: Democracy
Dewey
Festenstein
Issue Date: 2010
Publisher: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
Citation: Robert Talisse, "Saving Pragmatist Democratic Theory (from Itself)", in: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, XII (2010) 1, pp. 12−27.
Series/Report no.: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics
XII (2010) 1
Abstract: Deweyan democracy is inherently comprehensive in the Rawlsian sense and therefore unable to countenance the fact of reasonable pluralism. This renders Deweyan democracy nonviable on pragmatic grounds. Given the Deweyan pragmatists’ views about the proper relation between philosophy and politics, unless there is a viable pragmatist alternative to Deweyan democracy, pragmatism itself is jeopardized. I develop a pragmatist alternative to Deweyan democracy rooted in a Peircean social epistemology. Peircean democracy can give Deweyan pragmatists all they should want from a democratic theory while avoiding the anti-pluralistic implications of Dewey’s own democratic theory. After presenting the arguments against Deweyan democracy and for Peircean democracy, I address a criticism of Peircean democracy recently posed by Matthew Festenstein.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10077/4676
ISSN: 1825-5167
Appears in Collections:Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2010) XII/1

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Talisse_E&P_XII_2010_1.pdf168 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
View Statistics

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.