OpenstarTs >
EUT-Periodici >
Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics >
Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2010) XII/2 >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10077/5099

Title: Nature or History? Philosophical Anthropology in the History of Concepts
Authors: Martinelli, Riccardo
Keywords: anthropology
philosophy of history
psychology
Issue Date: 2010
Publisher: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
Citation: Riccardo Martinelli, "Nature or History? Philosophical Anthropology in the History of Concepts", in: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, XII (2010) 2, pp. 12-26.
Series/Report no.: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics
XII (2010) 2
Abstract: In a renowned essay, Odo Marquard’s set a cornerstone in defining anthropology from a history of concepts point of view. In the light of more recent researches, some of his conclusions are here reconsidered and criticised. The concept of anthropology, as developed by Herder, Kant, Wilhelm von Humboldt, romantic philosophers and physicians, and finally by Hegel and some of his followers, offers no evidence for Marquard’s alleged opposition between anthropology and philosophy of history. On the one side, in Kant’s or Hegel’s work anthropology is not as peripheral as Marquard argued; on the other side, romantic anthropologists developed a deep interest towards historical perspectives. Rather, anthropology was quite often considered as a nonmetaphysical alternative to psychology. These results also suggest a revision as to the role of anthropology on a broader historical scale.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10077/5099
ISSN: 1825-5167
Appears in Collections:Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2010) XII/2

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Martinelli_E&P_XII_2010_2.pdf174.4 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
View Statistics

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.