|
OpenstarTs >
EUT-Periodici >
Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics >
Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2009) XI/1 >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10077/5226
|
| Title: | Human Rights: A Modest Proposal |
| Authors: | Byron, Michael |
| Keywords: | Human rights Justification Pragmatism Consequentialism Transcendentalism |
| Issue Date: | 2009 |
| Publisher: | EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste |
| Citation: | Michael Byron, "Human Rights: A Modest Proposal", in: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, XI (2009) 1, pp. 470-494. |
| Series/Report no.: | Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics XI (2009) 1 |
| Abstract: | Human rights have become an enormously useful tool in our time, and this
for a variety of reasons. Useful, yes: but are rights real? I propose first to
examine the most significant philosophical attempts to justify human rights.
A universally justified conception of rights I call ‘robust,’ since a successful
rational justification would fully underwrite the real existence of rights. Alas,
we have no such justification; the second part of my remarks sketches
devastating objections to each proposed justification. But all is not lost for
rights: a new pragmatic justification for rights talk is available, one that is
modest. On the modest view rights are real; but then we should like to know
whether rights are as useful as they are on the robust view. Not as useful, no;
but a |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10077/5226 |
| ISSN: | 1825-5167 |
| Appears in Collections: | Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2009) XI/1
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|