OpenstarTs >
EUT-Periodici >
Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics >
Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2009) XI/1 >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10077/5226

Title: Human Rights: A Modest Proposal
Authors: Byron, Michael
Keywords: Human rights
Justification
Pragmatism
Consequentialism
Transcendentalism
Issue Date: 2009
Publisher: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
Citation: Michael Byron, "Human Rights: A Modest Proposal", in: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, XI (2009) 1, pp. 470-494.
Series/Report no.: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics
XI (2009) 1
Abstract: Human rights have become an enormously useful tool in our time, and this for a variety of reasons. Useful, yes: but are rights real? I propose first to examine the most significant philosophical attempts to justify human rights. A universally justified conception of rights I call ‘robust,’ since a successful rational justification would fully underwrite the real existence of rights. Alas, we have no such justification; the second part of my remarks sketches devastating objections to each proposed justification. But all is not lost for rights: a new pragmatic justification for rights talk is available, one that is modest. On the modest view rights are real; but then we should like to know whether rights are as useful as they are on the robust view. Not as useful, no; but a
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10077/5226
ISSN: 1825-5167
Appears in Collections:Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2009) XI/1

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Byron_E&P_XI_2009_1.pdf166.79 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
View Statistics

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.