|
OpenstarTs >
EUT-Periodici >
Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics >
Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2006) VIII/1 >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10077/5317
|
| Title: | Pluralismo argomentativo. Sull’argomentazione dell’interpretazione |
| Authors: | Barberis, Mauro |
| Keywords: | value pluralism legal argumentation |
| Issue Date: | 2006 |
| Publisher: | EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste |
| Citation: | Mauro Barberis, "Pluralismo argomentativo. Sull’argomentazione dell’interpretazione", in: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, VIII (2006) 1, pp. 1-21. |
| Series/Report no.: | Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics VIII (2006) 1 |
| Abstract: | The name of the theory of legal argumentation this paper subscribes could be argumentative
pluralism - an application of value pluralism to legal argumentation. Legal reasons and arguments,
as well as ethical values, are plural and conflicting - their conflicts too cannot be resolved
by any general lexical order. The first section of the paper provides a definition of legal
argumentation and some theses on its structure and methodology; the second one analyses
ten legal arguments; the third one provides three pluralist theses on legal argumentation. |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10077/5317 |
| ISSN: | 1825-5167 |
| Appears in Collections: | Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2006) VIII/1
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|