OpenstarTs >
EUT-Periodici >
Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics >
Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2006) VIII/1 >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10077/5317

Title: Pluralismo argomentativo. Sull’argomentazione dell’interpretazione
Authors: Barberis, Mauro
Keywords: value pluralism
legal argumentation
Issue Date: 2006
Publisher: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
Citation: Mauro Barberis, "Pluralismo argomentativo. Sull’argomentazione dell’interpretazione", in: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, VIII (2006) 1, pp. 1-21.
Series/Report no.: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics
VIII (2006) 1
Abstract: The name of the theory of legal argumentation this paper subscribes could be argumentative pluralism - an application of value pluralism to legal argumentation. Legal reasons and arguments, as well as ethical values, are plural and conflicting - their conflicts too cannot be resolved by any general lexical order. The first section of the paper provides a definition of legal argumentation and some theses on its structure and methodology; the second one analyses ten legal arguments; the third one provides three pluralist theses on legal argumentation.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10077/5317
ISSN: 1825-5167
Appears in Collections:Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2006) VIII/1

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Barberis_E&P_VIII_2006_1.pdf170.57 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
View Statistics

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.