OpenstarTs >
EUT-Periodici >
Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics >
Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2006) VIII/1 >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10077/5318

Title: La precomprensione dell’interprete è arbitraria?
Authors: Canale, Damiano
Keywords: preunderstanding
legal hermeneutics
Issue Date: 2006
Publisher: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
Citation: Damiano Canale, "La precomprensione dell’interprete è arbitraria?", in: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, VIII (2006) 1, pp. 1-42.
Series/Report no.: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics
VIII (2006) 1
Abstract: “Preunderstanding” is the core of the theoretical framework developed by legal hermeneutics. Legal interpretation is necessary guided by the know-how, the presuppositions and the attitudes of the interpreter. But if this is the case, how can we distinguish between a legitimate and a not legitimate preunderstanding, and also between a good and a bad interpretation? The paper tries to adress this question analyzing the structure of preunderstanding from the point of view of both legal hermeneutics and philosophical hermeneutics. The paper argues, in particular, that the preunderstanding of the judge can be treated as legitimate if corresponding to the “real thing” (Sache selbst) regulated by the text. Such a criterion can be articulated methodologically by means of an inferential approach to conceptual content and legal process.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10077/5318
ISSN: 1825-5167
Appears in Collections:Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2006) VIII/1

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Canale_E&P_VIII_2006_1.pdf261.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
View Statistics

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.