|
OpenstarTs >
EUT-Periodici >
Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics >
Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2006) VIII/1 >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10077/5319
|
| Title: | Conflitto e bilanciamento tra diritti fondamentali. Una mappa dei problemi |
| Authors: | Pino, Giorgio |
| Keywords: | weighing and balancing techniques conflict of rights |
| Issue Date: | 2006 |
| Publisher: | EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste |
| Citation: | Giorgio Pino, "Conflitto e bilanciamento tra diritti fondamentali. Una mappa dei problemi", in: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, VIII (2006) 1, pp. 1-57. |
| Series/Report no.: | Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics VIII (2006) 1 |
| Abstract: | In the current jurisprudential debate, the issue of conflicts of rights is a widely debated one.
The present essay aims at clarifying the main aspects of this ongoing debate, along the following
lines: firstly, an historical account of the problem of balancing conflicting rights will
be given, with an eye both to the American recent experience and to the Italian one. Secondly,
it will be discussed whether and under what circumstances rights can conflict. Thirdly,
after having acknowledged that conflicts of rights are in fact unavoidable, it will be necessary
to examine the main technique of solving those conflicts: namely, the “weighing and balancing”
technique. The main suggestion that is intended to follow from the whole discussion is
that the technique of balancing involves for sure a certain (sometimes, considerable) degree
of interpretive discretion, but nonetheless – at least under some circumstances -- it is not necessarily
incompatible with legal certainty and predictability of legal decisions. |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10077/5319 |
| ISSN: | 1825-5167 |
| Appears in Collections: | Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2006) VIII/1
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|