Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
  • Log In
    Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
Repository logo
  • Archive
  • Series/Journals
  • EUT
  • Events
  • Statistics
  • English
  • Italiano
  • Log In
    Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
  3. Periodici
  4. Slavica Tergestina
  5. Slavica Tergestina 26 (2021/I)
  6. Browse by Subject

Slavica Tergestina 26 (2021/I)

Permanent URI

https://www.openstarts.units.it/handle/10077/32484
Scarica il FullText

CONTENTS / SOMMARIO

Dović Marijan, Vidmar Luka

Foreword

Dović Marijan, Vidmar Luka

Habsburg Censorship and Literature in the Slovenian Lands

Bachleitner Norbert

From Paternalism to Authoritarianism: Censorship in the Habsburg Monarchy (1751–1848)

Ditmajer Nina

Banned Books in the Libraries of the Styrian Monasteries in the Early Modern Period

Deželak Trojar Monika

Schönleben’s Prohibited Mariological Works

Vidmar Luka

Secularization of Book Censorship under Maria Theresa: Between Catholic Tradition and Moderate Enlightenment

Pastar Andrej

Censorship in Carniola under Joseph II

Ogrin Matija

Slovenian Manuscripts of the Late Baroque: Literary Tradition Defying Enlightenment Censorship

Svoljšak Sonja

Banned French, English, and American Authors, and Their Works in the Ljubljana Lyceum Library up to 1848

Juvan Marko

Censorship and the Literary Field: Kopitar, Čop, and Krajnska čbelica

Dović Marijan

Slovenian Literature and Imperial Censorship after 1848

Perenič Urška

Literary Censorship and the Dramatic Society in Ljubljana (1891–1904)

Browsing Slavica Tergestina 26 (2021/I) by Subject "aesthetic autonomy"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Censorship and the Literary Field: Kopitar, Čop, and Krajnska čbelica
    (EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2021)
    Juvan, Marko
    Slovenian literary history discussed Austrian censorship in Carniola during the Pre-March Era mainly through the conflict between the Romantic poet Prešeren and backward secular and church authorities. This article changes the perspective by examining the paradox of censor as an instrument of imperial thought control and a trained expert resembling the literary critic. In the period of Metternich’s absolutist policing, censorship was inadvertently individualized. How censors relied on their aesthetic judgement, prestige, and strategies is shown by the treat-ment of the almanac Krajnska čbelica by Kopitar and Čop in the 1830s. During the “Slovenian alphabet war,” Kopitar’s Herderianism collided with the Romantic cosmopolitanism of Prešeren and Čop, who advocated the impor-tance of aesthetic autonomy for the national movement.
      916  1796
Indexed by

 Info

Open Access Policy

Share/Save

 Contacts

EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste

OpenstarTs

 Link

Wiki OpenAcces

Archivio Ricerca ArTS

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback