Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • Series/Journals
  • EUT
  • Events
  • Statistics
  • English
  • Italiano
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
  3. Periodici
  4. Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics
  5. Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2020) XXII/3
  6. The Intrinsic Justifiability of Grandfathering in Climate Politics
 
  • Details
  • Metrics
Options

The Intrinsic Justifiability of Grandfathering in Climate Politics

Kamminga, Menno R.
2021
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
ISSN
1825-5167
DOI
10.13137/1825-5167/31709
http://hdl.handle.net/10077/31709
  • Article

Abstract
Climate philosophers conceptualize ‘grandfathering’ as ‘emissions grandfathering’: past emission levels entitle to future emissions. With the notable but controversial exception of libertarian Luc Bovens (2011), they regard grandfathering as intrinsically, even if not instrumentally, unjust. Questioning both the standard dismissal and Bovens’s Lockean pro-argument, this article defends the intrinsic (albeit limited) fairness of grandfathering conceptualized as ‘resources grandfathering’: fossil resource creation entitles to future resources use. A threefold ‘social constructivist’ ethical argument for this position is developed. First, philosophers’ basic aversion to grandfathering, while consistent with their emissions-based understanding, rests on an undefended, shallow ‘cosmopolitan materialism’. Second, Bovens’s Lockean defense of the intrinsic fairness of grandfathering emission rights falls short for assuming a dubious ‘first-come first-served’ within a retained cosmopolitan materialism, although it sensibly suggests to include respect for investments in our understanding of grandfathering. Third, a ‘communitarian idealist’ defense of grandfathering, which stresses that ‘natural resources’ are cultural-historical creations, succeeds by undermining cosmopolitan materialism and eliminating first-come first-served. Thus, grandfathering supports Western countries and opposes (possibly) non-Western small rich or rapidly industrializing ones, and implies a critique of the view that the West owes a massive climate debt to developing countries. Yet, grandfathering, as distributional starting-point within a pluralist framework, should arguably be complemented by ‘no-harm’ and ‘ability to pay’.
Journal
Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics 
Subjects
  • limate justice

  • communitarianism

  • grandfathering

  • idealism

  • materialism

  • social constructivism...

Publisher
EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
Source
Menno R. Kamminga, "The Intrinsic Justifiability of Grandfathering in Climate Politics" in: "Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2020) XXII/3", EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, Trieste, 2021, pp. 751-768
Languages
en
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internazionale
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

38-Kamminga.pdf

Format

Adobe PDF

Size

366.4 KB

Download
Indexed by

 Info

Open Access Policy

Share/Save

 Contacts

EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste

OpenstarTs

 Link

Wiki OpenAcces

Archivio Ricerca ArTS

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback