Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
  • Log In
    Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
Repository logo
  • Archive
  • Series/Journals
  • EUT
  • Events
  • Statistics
  • English
  • Italiano
  • Log In
    Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
  3. Periodici
  4. Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics
  5. Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2013) XV/1
  6. The Newness of Nanoethics and the Consequentialist Bias
 
  • Details
  • Metrics
Options

The Newness of Nanoethics and the Consequentialist Bias

Bacchini, Fabio
2013
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
ISSN
1825-5167
http://hdl.handle.net/10077/8904
  • Article

Abstract
While many authors agree that a necessary condition for considering nanoethics as a new distinct field of inquiry is that some ethical problem arising in nanotechnology be new, I argue that we have good reasons to consider nanoethics as a new distinct field of applied ethics, although we have no good reason to think that any new ethical problem shows up in it. In fact, I claim that nanoethics will ask us to reshape our ways of conceiving reality, the relationship between ourselves and the external world, and the whole ethical dimension of such relationship – and this is enough for considering it as a new distinct field of inquiry. Then I offer a view of what is part of nanoethics and what is not, and in particular I argue that – under an account of ‘ethics’ and ‘nanoethics’ as battlefields for arguments supporting rival ethical conclusions – even a description of what people ethically think about nanotechnology, or a description of nanoethics itself, are not part of nanoethics. Finally I consider the possibility of a consequentialist bias affecting nanoethics: I admit that risks have inappropriately monopolised the debate and that some interesting nanoethical issues may have nothing to do with risks, but I also stress that it is particularly difficult to adopt a non-consequentialist view in nanoethics, because non-consequentialism presupposes that consequences are going to fall within a known range of possibilities, and this presupposition is not attainable in nanotechnology.
Series
Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics
XV (2013) 1
Subjects
  • nanoethics

  • nanotechnology

  • uncertainty

  • prescriptive

  • descriptive

  • consequentialist bias...

  • consequences

  • risks

Publisher
EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
Source
Fabio Bacchini, "The Newness of Nanoethics and the Consequentialist Bias", in: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, XV (2013) 1, pp. 321-332.
Languages
en
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

BACCHINI.pdf

Format

Adobe PDF

Size

200.66 KB

Indexed by

 Info

Open Access Policy

Share/Save

 Contacts

EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste

OpenstarTs

 Link

Wiki OpenAcces

Archivio Ricerca ArTS

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback