Publication:
On the change in surpluses equivalence: measuring benefits from transport infrastructure investments

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Date
2007
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
ISTIEE Istituto per lo studio dei trasporti nell’integrazione economica europea
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
Reductions in transport costs resulting from infrastructure improvements generate benefits that can be measured as surplus changes either at an economy-wide scale (social welfare changes) or, as is common practice in cost-benefit analysis (CBA), at a transport market level as transport users’ surplus changes. In this paper we look at an economy with spatially separated markets embedded in a transport network (a spatial price equilibrium model) to study the equivalence between these two benefit measures. Three different product market competition arrangements are considered. A similar question and strategy is presented in Jara-Díaz (1986) employing a two-node network and extreme competition assumptions on the production side: perfect competition and monopolistic production with arbitrage. We extend his work by additionally considering perfect collusion (monopoly without resale) and Cournot-Nash oligopoly under flow-dependent transport costs (i.e. congestion in transport). Numerical simulations in a three-node network with and without transshipment nodes, illustrate our main results.
Description
Keywords
Cost-benefit analysis, Indirect benefits
Citation
José Meléndez-Hidalgo, Piet Rietveld, Erik Verhoef, "On the change in surpluses equivalence: measuring benefits from transport infrastructure investments", in: European Transport / Trasporti Europei, XII (2007) 36, pp. 107-140.