Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
  • Log In
    Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
Repository logo
  • Archive
  • Series/Journals
  • EUT
  • Events
  • Statistics
  • English
  • Italiano
  • Log In
    Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
  3. Periodici
  4. Slavica Tergestina
  5. Slavica Tergestina 26 (2021/I)
  6. Censorship and the Literary Field: Kopitar, Čop, and Krajnska čbelica
 
  • Details
  • Metrics
Options

Censorship and the Literary Field: Kopitar, Čop, and Krajnska čbelica

Cenzura in literarno polje: Kopitar, Čop in Krajnska čbelica
Juvan, Marko
2021
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
ISSN
1592-0291
DOI
10.13137/2283-5482/32516
http://hdl.handle.net/10077/32516
  • Article

e-ISSN
2283-5482
Abstract
Slovenian literary history discussed Austrian censorship in Carniola during the Pre-March Era mainly through the conflict between the Romantic poet Prešeren and backward secular and church authorities. This article changes the perspective by examining the paradox of censor as an instrument of imperial thought control and a trained expert resembling the literary critic. In the period of Metternich’s absolutist policing, censorship was inadvertently individualized. How censors relied on their aesthetic judgement, prestige, and strategies is shown by the treat-ment of the almanac Krajnska čbelica by Kopitar and Čop in the 1830s. During the “Slovenian alphabet war,” Kopitar’s Herderianism collided with the Romantic cosmopolitanism of Prešeren and Čop, who advocated the impor-tance of aesthetic autonomy for the national movement.
O avstrijski cenzuri na Kranjskem v predmarčni dobi je slovenska literarna zgodovina pogosto razpravljala prek konflikta med romantičnim pesnikom Prešernom in zaostalimi posvetnimi in cerkvenimi oblastmi. Pričujoči članek spreminja perspektivo in poudari paradoks cenzorja kot instrumenta imperialne kontrole uma in usposobljenega strokovnjaka, podobnega literarnemu kritiku. V obdobju Metternichovega (policijskega) absolutizma je cenzura nenamerno postala individualizirana. Kako so se cenzorji oprli na svojo estetsko presojo, prestiž in strategije, dokazuje Kopitarjeva in Čopova obravnava alma-naha Krajnska čbelica. Med »slovensko abecedno vojno« 1833 se je Kopitarjevo herderjevstvo spopadlo s Prešernovim in Čopovim romantičnim kozmopolitizmom, ki je zagovarjal pomen estet-ske avtonomije za nacionalno gibanje.
Journal
Slavica Tergestina 
Subjects
  • censorship

  • literary criticism

  • aesthetic autonomy

  • austro-slavism

  • romanticism

  • slovenian literature

  • Jernej Kopitar

  • Matija Čop

  • France Prešeren

  • cenzura

  • literarna veda

  • estetska avtonomija

  • avstroslavizem

  • romantika

  • slovenska literatura

  • Jernej Kopitar

  • Matija Čop

  • France Prešeren

Publisher
EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
Source
Marko Juvan, "Censorship and the Literary Field: Kopitar, Čop, and Krajnska čbelica" in: "Slavica Tergestina 26 (2021/I)", EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, Trieste, 2021, pp. 245-285
Languages
en
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internazionale
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

09-Juvan.pdf

Format

Adobe PDF

Size

508.29 KB

Indexed by

 Info

Open Access Policy

Share/Save

 Contacts

EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste

OpenstarTs

 Link

Wiki OpenAcces

Archivio Ricerca ArTS

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback