Publication: Črno na belem, nihilizem brezpredmetnosti
Loading...
Date
2019
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
Abstract
Je mogoče s povezavo Malevičeve slike
Črno na belem in trodimenzionalnimi
obeležji na Ground Zero v New
Yorku (kocka v kocki) kot manifestaciji
militarističnega globalnega nihilizma
problematizirati brezpredmetnost
brezpredmetnosti suprematizma pri
Maleviču? Kaj pomeni molk nereprezentabilnosti?
Nezmožnost reči kaj
o predmetnosti brezpredmetnosti
ali pa zastiranje nihilistične resnice,
ki jo interpretacija/simbolizacija
vzpostavi kot točko nič govorice, prazni
označevalec, falos, na ozadju katerega
se razprejo ideološke manipulacije
in mahinacije sodobne ekonomije?
Je točka nič tisto, čemur Lacan pravi
ekstimnost, tišina Realnega, ki se upira
simbolizaciji, čeprav je tisto, kar uokvirja
simbolno dejanje prej in potem, ali
pa gre za potlačitev, agregat, ki poganja
neoliberalni stroj? Kako na tem ozadju
razpreti vprašanje govorice nezavednega
kot označevalca onkraj simbolizacije,
kako se v to vpiše samovita, zvezdna
beseda Hlebnikova ali brezpredmetnost
Maleviča? Kako brezpredmetnost
problematizirati na ozadju političnega
nezavednega ali v matrikah kozmičnega
nezavednega? Kako v tem razbrati zgodovinsko
usodo (Zahodnega) sveta.
Is it possible by connecting Malevich painting Black on white to the three-dimensional monumental squares within squares at the Ground Zero memorial park in New York to problematize the phenomenon of non-objectiveness of non-objectivity of the suprematism? What does the silence of the nonrepresentability expose? Impossibility to say anything about the non-objectivity, or does it hide the nihilistic truth, that a symbolization establishes as the point zero of language, an empty signifier, lacanian phalos, on the back of which the ideological machinations of the contemporary economy take place? Is the point zero the point that Lacan addresses as extymacy, the silence of the Real that rejects the symbolization as such, though it frames the symbolic act before and after, or rather do we deal with a suppressed aggregate that runs the neoliberal killing machine? Is it possible to address the language of the (political and cosmic) unconsciousness as the signifier beyond symbolization, and in what way the “self-sufficient (samovita) stary word” of Hlebnikov as well as non-objectivistic painting by Malevich fit into that?
Is it possible by connecting Malevich painting Black on white to the three-dimensional monumental squares within squares at the Ground Zero memorial park in New York to problematize the phenomenon of non-objectiveness of non-objectivity of the suprematism? What does the silence of the nonrepresentability expose? Impossibility to say anything about the non-objectivity, or does it hide the nihilistic truth, that a symbolization establishes as the point zero of language, an empty signifier, lacanian phalos, on the back of which the ideological machinations of the contemporary economy take place? Is the point zero the point that Lacan addresses as extymacy, the silence of the Real that rejects the symbolization as such, though it frames the symbolic act before and after, or rather do we deal with a suppressed aggregate that runs the neoliberal killing machine? Is it possible to address the language of the (political and cosmic) unconsciousness as the signifier beyond symbolization, and in what way the “self-sufficient (samovita) stary word” of Hlebnikov as well as non-objectivistic painting by Malevich fit into that?
Description
Keywords
Suprematizem, nihilizem, reprezentacija, brezpredmetnost, nezavedno (politično, kozmično), performativnost, matematika, tehnoznanost, Suprematism, nihilism, representation, non-objectivity, unconsciousness (political, cosmic), performativity, mathematics, technoscience
Citation
Iztok Osojnik, "Black on White, Nihilism of Non-Objectivity" in "Slavica Tergestina 22 (2019/I)", Trieste, EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2019, pp. 70-95