Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
  • Log In
    Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
Repository logo
  • Archive
  • Series/Journals
  • EUT
  • Events
  • Statistics
  • English
  • Italiano
  • Log In
    Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
  3. Periodici
  4. Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics
  5. Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2018) XX/2
  6. The Role of Exemplars in Kant’s Moral Philosophy
 
  • Details
  • Metrics
Options
The Role of Exemplars in Kant’s Moral Philosophy
Hovda, Jeremy
2018
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
ISSN
1825-5167
http://hdl.handle.net/10077/22325
  • Article

Abstract
On the subject of moral exemplarism, Immanuel Kant is perhaps best known for his warnings about the futility as well as the potential dangers of trying to base morality on examples or on the imitation of exemplars. This has led many scholars to conclude that Kant leaves no room for exemplars in his moral philosophy. However, as the work of Onora O‟Neill and Robert Louden has shown, Kant‟s position on the subject is in fact more ambiguous than it appears at first glance. Kant writes both of the need for a kind of archetype [Urbild] that can “make the law intuitive,” and of a positive role for examples and exemplars in the sharpening of moral judgment. Yet, O‟Neill and Louden disagree about the exact role and the stage of moral development where they come into play. O‟Neill claims that examples only play a role at a stage of moral development prior to the agent‟s assimilation of the moral law, and they never play a role in moral deliberation per se, while Louden sees a role for examples in moral deliberation subsequent to the assimilation of the moral law. Neither scholar specifies whether they play a role with regard to some specific duties or with regard to all duties indiscriminately. In this paper, I address these disagreements arguing that the key to their resolution and to gaining a correct understanding of Kant‟s position lies in a closer examination of Kant‟s taxonomy of duties, especially his distinction between „perfect‟ and „imperfect‟ duties. Such an examination, leads to the conclusion that is precisely in the fulfillment of imperfect duties, such as the obligation to perfect our talents and capacities and the obligation to aid the happiness of others, that Kant sees a necessary role for moral exemplars.
Journal
Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics 
Subjects
  • Kant

  • moral education

  • imperfect duties

  • exemplars

Publisher
EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
Source
Jeremy Hovda, "The Role of Exemplars in Kant’s Moral Philosophy", in "Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2018) XX/2", Trieste, EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2018, pp. 31-44
Languages
en
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internazionale
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

03_HOVDA.pdf

Format

Adobe PDF

Size

382.2 KB

Indexed by

 Info

Open Access Policy

Share/Save

 Contacts

EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste

OpenstarTs

 Link

Wiki OpenAcces

Archivio Ricerca ArTS

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback