Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2014) XVI/2

Scarica il FullText

CONTENTS / SOMMARIO


Monographica I Naturalizzare, normalizzare, potenziare. Prospettive filosofiche su Neuroscience e Neurolaw


Fuselli Stefano

Guest Editor's Preface

Nunziante Antonio-Maria

Naturalismo e neuroscienze. Sulla genesi storica di un legame teorico

Gaiani Alberto

Riduzionismo e neuroscienze: il dibattito filosofico recente

Sarra Claudio

Questioni pregiudiziali: una prospettiva epistemologica sui rapporti tra neuroscienze e diritto

Fuselli Stefano

Ripensare l’uomo: ripensare il diritto? Sui supposti fondamenti neurobiologici del diritto

Sommaggio Paolo

Neurocivilizzazione

Palazzani Laura

La mente farmacologicamente potenziata: problemi bioetici e biogiuridici

Amato Salvatore

Neuroscienze e utilizzazione militare delle tecniche di potenziamento umano


Monographica II Rethinking Cicero as Political Philosopher


Giorgini Giovanni, Irrera Elena

Editor’s and Guest Editor’s Preface

Lisi Francisco Leonardo

La noción de ley natural en Cicerón

Fott David

Skepticism about Natural Right in Cicero’s De Republica

Englert Walter

Epicurean Philosophy in Cicero’s De Republica: Serious Threat or Convenient Foil?

Prost François

Un dittico esemplare nel primo pensiero politico di Cicerone

Iacoboni Anna

Il significato politico del mos maiorum in Cicerone

Paulson Lex

A Painted Republic: the Constitutional Innovations of Cicero’s De legibus

Colotte Franck

Le De Officiis de Cicéron : un manuel de vertu pratique?

Fermani Arianna

Tra vita contemplativa e vita attiva: il De Officiis di Cicerone e le sue radici aristoteliche

Gastaldi Silvia

Vita politica e vita filosofica nei proemi del De republica di Cicerone

Schütrumpf Eckart

Cicero’s View on the Merits of a Practical Life in De republica 1: What is Missing? A comparison with Plato and Aristotle

Havlíček Aleš

Philosophie und Politik bei Cicero

Pagnotta Fausto

Cicerone nell’opera e nel pensiero politico di Machiavelli: alcune considerazioni introduttive

Neschke-Hentschke Ada

Il contributo di Cicerone alla nascita della dottrina moderna della “sovranità del popolo”

Martelli Fabio, Tossani Eleonora

La Retorica del tradimento. Pensiero e technē ciceroniano nell'orazione di Saint-Just il 13 Novembre 1792

Tosi Elena

Americanus sum nec quidquam Americani a me alienum esse puto: i classici latini e la nuova identità statunitense in John Adams

Irrera Elena

Cicero on Different Kinds of Respect for Persons. A ‘Darwallian’ Approach

Giorgini Giovanni

Cicero and Machiavelli: Two Visions of Statesmanship and Two Educational Projects Compared


Monographica III Moral realism and political decisions


De Anna Gabriele, Martinelli Riccardo

Guest Editors’ Preface

Martinelli Riccardo

Realism, ontology, and the concept of reality

Lavecchia Salvatore

Agathological Realism:* Searching for the Good Beyond Subjectivity and Objectivity or On the Importance of Being Platonic

Fischer Alexander, Fuchs Marko J.

‘Solidarity at the Time of the Fall’: Adorno and Rorty on Moral Realism

De Caro Mario, Marraffa Massimo

Bacon against Descartes. Emotions, Rationality, Defenses

Labinaz Paolo

Reasoning, Argumentation and Rationality

Becker Thomas

Is Truth Relevant? On the Relevance of Relevance

Sbisà Marina

The Austinian Conception of Illocution and its Implications for Value Judgments and Social ontology

Illies Christian

The Relevance of Anthropology and the Evolutionary Sciences for Political Philosophy

De Anna Gabriele

Realism, Human Action and Political Life. On the Political Dimension of Individual Choices

Ancona Elvio

Determining Ius According to Thomas Aquinas: a Realistic Model for Juridical Decisions

Stopford John

Reason, Morality, and Skill


Monographica IV Soggetto, identità, alterità


Marrone Pierpaolo

Editor’s Preface

Cossutta Marco

L’essere umano fra soggettività giuridica ed oggettività economica. Note sulla non-cittadinanza fra diritti fondamentali ed incapacità giuridica speciale

Cristin Renato

Il complesso d’Europa. Comprensione di sé e interpretazione dell’altro nell’identità europea

Marrone Pierpaolo

Subjects to Dialogue

Polidori Fabio

L’altro che forse sono. Tra umano e animale


Simposio Hans Lindahl, Fault Lines of Globalization. Legal Order and the Politics of A-Legality, Oxford University Press, 2013


Menga Ferdinando G.

A-Legality: Journey to the Borders of Law. In Dialogue with Hans Lindahl

Christodoulidis Emilios

Lindahl’s Phenomenology of Legality

Ciaramelli Fabio

Vers une phénoménologie de l’a-légalité

Loughlin Martin

A-legality or Jus Politicum? A Critical Appraisal of Lindahl’s Fault Lines of Globalization

Näsström Sofia

What Bounds A-Legality?

Rummens Stefan

Contingency and Reason: Some Habermasian Reflections on A-Legality

Neil Walker Neil Walker

Legal Thinking Inside and Outside the Box

Lindahl Hans

Reply to Critics


Varia


Baccarini Elvio

Public Reason and Moral Bioenhancement

Biasetti Pierfrancesco

Rights, Duties, and Moral Conflicts

Cevolani Gustavo, Festa Roberto

Giochi dei beni pubblici: il problema dei beni pubblici nella prospettiva della teoria dei giochi

Greblo Edoardo

I confini della cittadinanza

Innerarity Daniel

Democracia sin política: ¿por qué la democracia puede perjudicar seriamente a la democracia?

Malatesti Luca

Psychopathy and Failures of Ordinary Doing

Monteleone Ester

Iris Murdoch: la relazione tra l’interiorità e il comportamento pubblico è la moralità

Prijić – Samaržija Snježana

Hybrid virtues

Rasini Vallori

What Remains of Man and of the World: Reflections on the Age of Ecological Crisis

Details


INFORMATION ON THE JOURNAL


Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics is an open access philosophical journal, being published only in an electronic format. The journal aims at promoting research and reflection, both historically and theoretically, in the field of moral and political philosophy, with no cultural preclusion or adhesion to any cultural current. Contributions should be submitted in one of these languages: Italian, English, French, German, Portuguese, Spanish. All essays should include an English abstract of max. 200 words. The editorial staff especially welcomes interdisciplinary contributions with special attention to the main trends of the world of practice. The journal has an anonymous double peer review referee system. Three issues per year are expected. The copyright of the published articles remain to the authors. We ask that in any future use of them Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics be quoted as a source. All products on this site are released with a Creative Commons license (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 IT) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/it/


ETICA & POLITICA / ETHICS & POLITICS POSITION ON PUBLISHING ETHICS

The Editors of Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics have taken every possible measure to ensure the quality of the material here published and, in particular, they guarantee that peer review at their journal is fair, unbiased and timely, and that all papers have been reviewed by unprejudiced and qualified reviewers. The publication of an article through a peer-review process is intended as an essential feature of any serious scientific community. The decision to accept or reject a paper for publication is based on the paper’s relevance, originality and clarity, the study’s validity and its relevance to the mission of the journal. In order to guarantee the quality of the published papers, the Editors encourage reviewers to provide detailed comments to motivate their decisions. The comments will help the Editorial Board to decide the outcome of the paper, and will help to justify this decision to the author. If the paper is accepted with the request of revision, the comments should guide the author in making the revisions for the final manuscript. All material submitted to the journal remains confidential while under review. Once the author receives a positive answer, he/she should send the final version of the article since proofs will not be sent to him/her. E&P will publish the paper within twelve months from the moment of the acceptance, and the author will be informed of the publication. The journal is committed to such standards as originality in research papers, precise references in discussing other scholars’ positions, avoiding plagiarism. E&P takes these standards extremely seriously, because we think that they embody scientific method and are the mark of real scholarly communication. Since Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics is devoted solely to scientific and academic quality, the journal neither has any submission charges nor any article processing charges. The following guidelines are based on existing Elsevier policies and COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors


1. PUBLICATION AND AUTHORSHIP

EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, is the publisher of the peer reviewed international journal Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics. The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed journal is an essential step of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behaviour for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher. Authors need to ensure that the submitted article is the work of the submitting author(s) and is not plagiarized, wholly or in part. They must also make sure that the submitted article is original, is not wholly or in part a re-publication of the author’s earlier work, and contains no fraudulent data. It is also their responsibility to check that all copyrighted material within the article has permission for publication and that material for which the author does not personally hold copyright is not reproduced without permission. Finally, authors should ensure that the manuscript submitted is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.


2. AUTHOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES

Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics is a peer-reviewed journal, and Authors are obliged to participate in our double blind peer review process. Authors must make sure that all and only the contributors to the article are listed as authors. Authors should also ensure that all authors provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.


3. PEER REVIEW AND REVIEWERS’ RESPONSIBILITIES

Both the Referee and the Author remain anonymous throughout the “double blind” review process. Referees are selected according to their expertise in their particular fields. Referees have a responsibility to be objective in their judgments; to have no conflict of interest with respect to the research, with respect to the authors and/or with respect to the research funders; to point out relevant published work which is not yet cited by the author(s); and to treat the reviewed articles confidentially.


4. EDITORIAL RESPONSIBILITIES
Editors hold full authority to reject/accept an article; to accept a paper only when reasonably certain; to promote publication of corrections or retractions when errors are found; to preserve anonymity of reviewers; and to have no conflict of interest with respect to articles they reject/accept. If an Editor feels that there is likely to be a perception of a conflict of interest in relation to their handling of a submission, they will declare it to the other Editors. The other Editors will select referees and make all decisions on the paper.


5. PUBLISHING ETHICS ISSUES

Members of the Editorial Board ensure the monitoring and safeguarding of the publishing ethics. This comprises the strict policy on plagiarism and fraudulent data, the strong commitment to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies when needed, and the strict preclusion of business needs from compromising intellectual and ethical standards. Whenever it is recognized that a published paper contains a significant inaccuracy, misleading statement or distorted report, it will be corrected promptly. If, after an appropriate investigation, an item proves to be fraudulent, it will be retracted. The retraction will be clearly identifiable to readers and indexing systems.



PAST ISSUE AND STATISTICS

Past issues with download and visitors statistics for each article are provided here: http://www.openstarts.units.it/dspace/handle/10077/4673



DIREZIONE / EDITOR:

Riccardo Fanciullacci (Venezia) riccardofanciullacci@libero.it

Pierpaolo Marrone (Trieste) marrone@units.it



REDAZIONE / EDITORIAL BOARD:

Elvio Baccarini (Rijeka) ebaccarini@ffri.hr

Roberto Festa (Trieste) festa@units.it

Giovanni Giorgini (Bologna) giovanni.giorgini@unibo.it

Edoardo Greblo (Trieste) edgreblo@tin.it

Fabio Polidori (Trieste) polidori@units.it



WEBMASTER:

Enrico Marchetto (Trieste) enrico.marchetto@gmail.com


COMITATO SCIENTIFICO NAZIONALE / ITALIAN ADVISORY BOARD:

A. Agnelli † (Trieste), A. Allegra (Perugia), G. Alliney (Macerata), S. Amato (Catania), M. Anzalone (Napoli), D. Ardilli (Modena), F. Aronadio (Roma), G. Azzoni (Pavia), F. Bacchini (Sassari), E. Berti (Padova), M. Bettetini (Milano), P. Bettineschi (Venezia), P. Biasetti (Padova), G. Bistagnino (Milano) R. Caporali (Bologna), A.A. Cassi (Bergamo), G. Catapano (Padova), M. Cossutta (Trieste), L. Cova (Trieste), S. Cremaschi (Vercelli), G. Cevolani (Modena), R. Cristin (Trieste), U. Curi (Padova), G. De Anna (Udine), P. Donatelli (Roma), P. Donini (Milano), M. Faraguna (Milano), M. Ferraris (Torino), L. Floridi (Oxford), R. Frega (Bologna), S. Fuselli (Verona), A. Fussi (Pisa), C. Galli (Bologna), R. Giovagnoli (Roma), P. Kobau (Torino), E. Irrera (Bologna), E. Lecaldano (Roma), L.A. Macor (Oxford), E. Manganaro (Trieste), G. Maniaci (Palermo), R. Martinelli (Trieste), F.G. Menga (Tübingen), R. Mordacci (Milano), V. Morfino (Milano), B. de Mori (Padova), M. Pagano (Vercelli), G. Pellegrino (Roma), V. Rasini (Modena-Reggio Emilia), M. Reichlin (Milano), M. Renzo (Stirling), A. Rigobello (Roma), P.A. Rovatti (Trieste), S. Semplici (Roma), A. Schiavello (Palermo), A. Sciumè (Bergamo), M. Sgarbi (Venezia), F. Toto (Roma), F. Trabattoni (Milano), F. Trifirò (London), M.S. Vaccarezza (Genova), C. Vigna (Venezia), P. Vignola (Guayaquil) S. Zeppi † (Trieste).


COMITATO SCIENTIFICO INTERNAZIONALE / INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY BOARD:

J. Allan (New Zealand), K. Ballestrem (Germany), T. Bedorf (Germany), G. Betz (Germany), W. Block (USA), M. Byron (USA), S. Chambers (Canada), J. Coleman (UK), C. Cowley (Ireland), W. Edelglass (USA), C.L. Geshekter (USA), A. Kalyvas (USA), J. Kelemen (Hungary), F. Klampfer (Slovenia), M. Knoll (Turkey), C. Illies (Germany), D. Innerarity (Spain), A. Lever (Switzerland), H. Lindahl (Netherlands), J. Marti (Spain), M. Matulovic (Croatia), J. McCormick (USA), N. Miscevic (Croatia), A. Moles (Hungary), L. Paulson (France), A. Przylesbski (Poland), J. Quong (USA) V. Rakic (Serbia), A. Schaap (UK), B. Schultz (USA), N. Tarcov (USA), D. Webb (UK), J.P. Zamora Bonilla (Spain).


REFEREES LIST FOR 2017

B. Accarino (Università di Firenze), A. Altobrando (China University of Politics and Law, Pechino) A. Allegra (Università per Stranieri, Perugia), S. Amato (Università di Catania), P. Bettineschi (Università di Padova), S. Blancu (LUMSA, Roma), M. Ballistreri (Università di Torino), M. Bettetini (IULM, Milano), C. Canullo (Università di Macerata), R. Caporali (Università di Bologna), G. Cevolani (IMT, Lucca), F. Ciaramelli (Università di Napoli, Federico II), A. Cislaghi (Università di Trieste), R. Cristin (Università di Trieste), G. De Anna (Università di Udine), P. Donatelli (Università di Roma, La Sapienza), A. Fabris (Università di Pisa), S. Ferrando (Université de Strasbourg), A. Fussi (Università di Pisa), C. Gerbaz (Università di Rijeka), B. Giovanola (Università di Macerata), G. Grandi (Università di Padova), L. Greco (Università di Oxford), M.L. Lanzillo (Università di Bologna), G. Maniaci (Università di Palermo), R. Martinelli (Università di Trieste), F. Menga (Università di Tubinga), F. Miano (Università di Roma, Tor Vergata), M. Monaldi (Università di Trieste), R. Mordacci (Università San Raffaele, Milano), B. De Mori (Università di Padova), G. Pellegrino (LUISS, Roma), U. Pomarici (Università della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”), V. Rasini (Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia), C. Rofena (Università Ca’ Foscari, Venezia), A. Schiavello (Università di Palermo), P. Šustar (Università di Rijeka), M. Trobok (Università di Rijeka), F. Turoldo (Università Ca’ Foscari, Venezia), M. Vaccarezza (Università di Genova), S. Zanardo (Università Europea di Roma).


E&P è indicizzata in / E&P is indexed on

Browse

Recent Submissions

Now showing 1 - 5 of 61
  • Publication
    What Remains of Man and of the World: Reflections on the Age of Ecological Crisis
    (EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2014)
    Rasini, Vallori
    Man and world look like residuals: human being is an organic remnant relic), as the survivor of a process of self alienation, in which the machine has been elected as a despot; world (or nature) is exhausted in the attempt to maintain a balance. The contemporary massive technological development seems supported by the idea that man is a Homo faber authorized to operate on nature without limits. This is the idea of a superior being with a dominant role in the world. The Judaic-Christian tradition has certainly promoted this idea; but it reproduces in another dimension the relations typical of the greek oikos: not justice, but authority and subordination for advantage the “head of the family”. Renouncing to want own the Earth (like an ordinary thing) can perhaps open the way for a new ethic.
      780  665
  • Publication
    Hybrid virtues
    (EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2014)
    Prijić – Samaržija, Snježana
    The controversies about cases such us of epistemic injustice, epistemic paternalism and epistocracy indicate that knowledge needs to be considered as socially situated phenomena and, consequently, that epistemic attitudes, social practices and institutions require evaluation from both an epistemic and an ethical/political perspective. The project titled as ethics of knowing and, especially, promising concept of hybrid virtues or corresponding hybrid view provides a desirable framework for the comprehensive evaluation of beliefs, social institutions and practices that embrace intellectual as well as ethical and political values. In the paper, I will start with exploring testimonial justice as a form of epistemic justice or, more precisely, by questioning of both epistemic and ethical justificatory status of credibility deficit and credibility excess in everyday epistemic practices. I will argue that not only an epistemic attitude such as credibility excess, but also social practices such as epistemic paternalism or epistocracy demonstrate the conflict of epistemic and ethical/political values and impose on us various doubts concerning the content of a hybrid view. Consequently, I will address the questions of the minimal conditions of epistemic attitude, practice or institution that deserve an ascription of virtuous in a hybrid sense.
      900  618
  • Publication
    Iris Murdoch: la relazione tra l’interiorità e il comportamento pubblico è la moralità
    (EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2014)
    Monteleone, Ester
    In this essay I will focus on two theoretical threads which I see as intertwined in Murdoch’s philosophical work: the thread of consciousness which is in relationship with the Good, that Murdoch considers the “magnet” of morality and religion, and the thread of public conduct. Firstly, distancing herself from behaviorism, Murdoch highlights the serious damage which comes from a linguistic method incapable of considering the moral relevance of mental events: the particular experience which takes place in the conscience exists. Murdoch’s recovery of Platonist thought brings her to indicate the moral pilgrimage as path of moral discipline: she considers how the subject through the exercise of virtue in the daily life establishes a relationship with the Good, understood in a Platonistic way as impersonal and transcendent. Furthermore she recovers the ontological proof of Anselm, which she considers essential in demonstrating that nothing is more necessary in moral philosophy than the recognition of Good as an unconditional element in the structure of reason and reality. Secondly, distancing herself from the critique of religion, Murdoch, instead, formulates a new type of religion which has at its centre a concept which is valid for every human being (even those who do not believe in God): Good intended as virtue, which becomes the absolute goal of human life – it is the “bridge” between morality and religion. Thirdly Iris Murdoch integrates her meditation on the conscience with the theory of obligation, a reflection on public morality, whose characteristics are not assimilable to the inner life. Murdoch considers the important role of duty, as external rule which operates when the moral instinct fails, when the subject prefers to follow his natural selfish inclination because he doesn’t reflect carefully. According to Murdoch, even if morality is not reducible to a list of duties, these duties are, nevertheless, indispensable; their task is to stop egoism (duty is “a bridle placed on egoism”).
      1021  1283
  • Publication
    Psychopathy and Failures of Ordinary Doing
    (EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2014)
    Malatesti, Luca
    One of the philosophical discussions stimulated by the recent scientific study of psychopathy concerns the mental illness status of this construct. This paper contributes to this debate by recommending a way of approaching the problem at issue. By relying on and integrating the seminal work of the philosopher of psychiatry Bill Fulford, I argue that a mental illness is a harmful unified construct that involves failures of ordinary doing. Central to the present proposal is the idea that the notion of failure of ordinary doing, besides the first personal experience of the patient, has to be spelled out also by referring to a normative account of idealised conditions of agency. This account would have to state in particular the conditions which are required for moral responsibility. I maintain that psychopathy is a unified enough construct that involves some harms. The question whether the condition involves also a failure of ordinary doing, as this notion is understood in this paper, is not investigated here.
      706  516
  • Publication
    Democracia sin política: ¿por qué la democracia puede perjudicar seriamente a la democracia?
    (EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2014)
    Innerarity, Daniel
    Rather than in a post-democracy, we are living in a time of post-politics, a democracy without politics. The political activism, as well as “negative sovereign”, both have increased. However, positive sovereign, the political capacity of shaping the amalgam of social claims, has not increased in the same manner. This unbalance between what citizens can prevent and what we are able to shape has led to a depolitization of our public spaces, in which insensitive technocrats to democratic reasons and populists that ignore what is political possible, face each other. The only possible way to politicize our democracies is by exploring their limitations and protecting them against themselves.
      770  851