Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: The Relevance of Anthropology and the Evolutionary Sciences for Political Philosophy
Authors: Illies, Christian
Keywords: Anthropologyevolutionary sciencespolitical theoryconvergenceDarwinGehlenDiamondBurkertvon Hayek
Issue Date: 2014
Publisher: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
Source: Christian Illies, "The Relevance of Anthropology and the Evolutionary Sciences for Political Philosophy", in: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, XVI (2014) 2, pp. 632-660
Series/Report no.: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics
XVI (2014) 2
Abstract: Two contrasting interpretations of the interrelation between politics and anthropology have co-existed in recent literature. On the one hand, the social sciences have freed themselves al-most completely from the idea that there is a basic nature common to all human beings. After the “cultural turn” within these disciplines, they took it for granted that immediate access to facts is methodologically impossible, including facts about the purported nature of human beings. On the other hand, the past century was triumphal procession of evolutionary sci-ences. These disciplines unquestionably shed light on the biological species homo sapiens. This essay defends neither of these two extreme positions, but looks for possibilities of updating the traditional synthetic view that is based upon an interrelation of natural and political sciences. To do so, it focuses on two questions. What do evolutionary sciences tell us about human be-ings and about the development of culture? What practical consequences can we draw from this for political philosophy? Answering these questions calls for a discussion of the work of Darwin, Gehlen, von Hayek, Diamond, Burkert and others.
ISSN: 1825-5167
Appears in Collections:Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2014) XVI/2

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ILLIES.pdf412.34 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

checked on Oct 23, 2018


checked on Oct 23, 2018

Google ScholarTM


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons