Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10077/11863
Title: Quantification of the environmental structural risk with spoiling ties: Is randomization worth?
Authors: Pappadà, Roberta
Durante, Fabrizio
Salvadori, Gianfausto
Keywords: CopulaRisk ManagementRandomizationJitteringStructura Risk
Issue Date: 20-Dec-2015
Series/Report no.: Research Paper Series
2 (2015)
Abstract: Many recent works show that copulas turn out to be useful in a variety of different ap- plications, especially in environmental sciences. Here the variables of interest are usually continuous, being times, lengths, weights, and so on. Unfortunately, the corresponding observations may suffer from (instrumental) rounding and adjustments, and eventually they may show several repeated values (i.e., ties). In turn, on the one hand, a tricky issue of identifiability of the model arises, and, on the other hand, the assessment of the risk may be adversely affected. A possible remedy is to introduce suitable randomization procedures: here three different jittering strategies are outlined. The target of the work is to carry out a simulation study in order to evaluate the effects of the randomization of multivariate observations when ties are present. In particular, it will be investigated whether, how, and to what extent, the randomization may change the estimation of the structural risk: for this purpose, a coastal engineering example will be used, as archetypical of a broad class of models and problems in engineering practice. Practical advices and warnings about the use of randomization techniques are hence given.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10077/11863
eISBN: 978-88-8303-719-1
Appears in Collections:DEAMS Research Paper Series 2015, 2

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
DEAMS_RP_2015_2_Pappada_Durante_Salvadori.pdfFull text294.91 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
DEAMS_RP_2015_2_Cover.jpgFront cover822.87 kBJPEGThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record


CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

545
checked on Oct 22, 2018

Download(s)

502
checked on Oct 22, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons