Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Comment Fichte lit Machiavel
Authors: Raddrizzani, Ives
Keywords: FichteMachiavelliPoliticsEthicsPhilosophy
Issue Date: 24-Feb-2016
Publisher: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
Source: Ives Raddrizzani, "Comment Fichte lit Machiavel", in: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, XVII (2015) 3, pp.47-57
Series/Report no.: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics
XVII (2015) 3
Abstract: This article aims, first, to clarify Fichte’s judgment on Machiavelli, second, to explain the reasons for the former's interest in the latter within the context of late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century history. Fichte did not admire Machiavelli from a philosophical or a religious, but from a moral perspective. The one-sidedness and blindness of the author of The Prince did not prevent Fichte from endorsing the "more serious and stronger" conception of politics advocated by him: the war in Germany alongside the subversion of the foundations of the rule of law made it necessary to rehabilitate the Machiavellian recipe in the management of politics. However. Fichte also stressed the limits of the Machiavellian program: Machiavelli only considered a situation in which the rule of law is not assured.
ISSN: 1825-5167
Appears in Collections:Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2015) XVII/3

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
04_E&P_2015_3_RADRIZZANI.pdf115.66 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
checked on Oct 16, 2018


checked on Oct 16, 2018

Google ScholarTM


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons