Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: A Refutation of Democratic Peace Assumptions in Liberal Projects for Global Order
Authors: Piras, Elisa
Keywords: John RawlsMichael Doyleliberalismworld orderdemocratic peace
Issue Date: 24-Feb-2016
Publisher: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
Source: Elisa Piras, "A Refutation of Democratic Peace Assumptions in Liberal Projects for Global Order", in: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, XVII (2015) 3, pp.262-280
Series/Report no.: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics
XVII (2015) 3
From Kant’s plan for perpetual peace to Rawls’s proposal of a law of peoples, liberal projects for world order assume the homogeneity of states’ regimes as a determinant factor for bringing about peace and moral progress. Particularly, at the foundations of Rawlsian internationalism is the ‘fact’ of democratic peace, considered to be a sound and immutable feature of the international system. This article questions this oversimplified reading of Michael Doyle’s hypothesis about the apparent existence of a ‘separate peace’ among democratic states. It argues that liberal projects for global order should consider the ‘separate peace’ merely as a working hypothesis and they should address also the problematic aspects related to it, namely the unnecessary aggressiveness that democratic states show towards non-democracies and the coercive – and possibly illiberal – nature of the Society of Peoples.
ISSN: 1825-5167
Appears in Collections:Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2015) XVII/3

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
16_E&P_2015_3_PIRAS.pdf227.37 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

checked on Jul 13, 2019


checked on Jul 13, 2019

Google ScholarTM


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons