Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10077/12223
Title: Aporetic State and Extended Emotions: the Shameful Recognition of Contradictions in the Socratic Elenchus
Authors: Candiotto, Laura
Keywords: Socrateselenchusaporetic stateshameextended mindextended emotions
Issue Date: 25-Feb-2016
Publisher: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
Source: Laura Candiotto, " Recognition of Contradictions in the Socratic Elenchus", in: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, XVII (2015) 2, pp.219-234
Series/Report no.: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics
XVII (2015) 2
Abstract: 
The Socratic elenchus is a procedure which tests out the consistency of the interlocutors’ beliefs. To this end, it is necessary to carry out, alongside the renowned Socratic strategies (questioning, examples, definitions, etc.), also an emotional process acting inside reasoning and where shame has a leading role. The aporetic state is a good example of the collaboration of emotions and reasoning, growing from the shameful recognition of contradictions. It is a cognitive and emotional acknowledgement of errors that pushes the subject to transform his/her behaviour. The use of emotions is not merely a rhetorical strategy for argumentation; emotions are the elements that embody knowledge into a practice capable of transforming life into a good life thereby determining the rational way of living for flourishing.The recognition of mistakes does not happen just “in the head” but is “extended” in the public environment that permits the generation of shame. This is the case, not only because shame is a “collective emotion” but because the audience is a necessary component of the catharsis. My main thesis concerns what I call the “extended elenchus”, a process based on the extended nature of the aporetic state. The first section highlights the “necessity thesis”, or the role of emotions in reasoning; the second focuses on shame as an epistemic emotion and on the cognitive role played by the audience in the implementation of the “system of shame”; the third addresses the role of cathartic and zetetic aporia.
Type: Article
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10077/12223
ISSN: 1825-5167
Appears in Collections:Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2015) XVII/2

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
12_E&P_2015_2_candiotto.pdf176.45 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record


CORE Recommender

Page view(s) 50

601
checked on Oct 25, 2020

Download(s)

558
checked on Oct 25, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons