Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10077/12708
Title: | WRONGNESS, EVOLUTIONARY DEBUNKING, PUBLIC RULES | Authors: | Hooker, Brad | Keywords: | Evolutionary debunking; Publicity; blame | Issue Date: | 9-May-2016 | Publisher: | EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste | Source: | Brad Hooker, "WRONGNESS, EVOLUTIONARY DEBUNKING, PUBLIC RULES", in: "Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2016) XVIII/1", Trieste, EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2016, pp. 135-149 | Series/Report no.: | Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2016) XVIII/1 |
Abstract: | Katarzyna de Lazari-Radek and Peter Singer’s wonderful book, The Point of View of the Universe: Sidgwick and Contemporary Ethics, contains a wealth of intriguing arguments and compelling ideas. The present paper focuses on areas of continuing dispute. The paper first attacks Lazari-Radek’s and Singer’s evolutionary debunking arguments against both egoism and parts of common-sense morality. The paper then addresses their discussion of the role of rules in utilitarianism. De Lazari-Radek and Singer concede that rules should constitute our moral decision procedure and our public morality. This paper argues that, if no one should be blamed for complying with the optimal decision procedure and optimal public rules, there are strong reasons to accept that these same rules distinguish what is morally permissible from what is morally wrong. |
Type: | Article | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10077/12708 | ISSN: | 1825-5167 |
Appears in Collections: | Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2016) XVIII/1 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
HOOKER.pdf | 138.2 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
CORE Recommender
Page view(s) 50
762
checked on May 24, 2022
Download(s) 50
304
checked on May 24, 2022
Google ScholarTM
Check
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License