Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Authors: Nakano Okuno, Mariko
Keywords: Henry Sidgwickuniversalizabilityimpartialityexpanding circleobjective normative truthour cosmic insignificanceinsect brainanimal ethics
Issue Date: 9-May-2016
Publisher: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
Source: Mariko Nakano Okuno, "UNIVERSALIZABILITY, IMPARTIALITY AND THE EXPANDING CIRCLE", in: "Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2016) XVIII/1", Trieste, EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2016, pp. 151-167
Series/Report no.: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics
(2016) XVIII/1
Abstract: This paper deals with the question of whether the universalizability of moral judgment, and impartiality in ethics, would require us to expand our scope of moral consideration to cover all sentient beings, human or non-human, as de Lazari-Radek and Singer wish to establish in their new volume on Sidgwick and contemporary ethics. I will argue that the former two concepts, universalizability and impartiality, may not entail the third concept, the expanding circle. De Lazari-Radek and Singer’s arguments may presuppose their moral intuitions that are not entirely self-evident, and the philosophical foundation of ethics Sidgwick presented does not necessarily lead us to their version of utilitarianism.
ISSN: 1825-5167
Appears in Collections:Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2016) XVIII/1

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
NAKANO.pdf150.53 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

checked on Oct 20, 2018


checked on Oct 20, 2018

Google ScholarTM


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons