Il processo a Dreyfus: echi e trasformazioni dell’affaire in Schnitzler e Kafka

Abstract

If it is true that the Dreyfus Affair brought the “Jewish Question” into the public spotlight, then it is equally true that the trial of the French officer showed how overnight society could deprive a man of his rights, make him a criminal and alienate him. The scandal, which threatened the foundations of democracy and justice, turned the Dreyfus Affair into a sort of paradigm. Literature responded with tales of people whose behaviour and aspirations clashed with a society in which legal equality had become an empty formula and the law was applied arbitrarily. This article focuses on Hannah Arendt’s analysis of the Dreyfus Affair as it clarifies various levels of meaning within German-Jewish literature, the authors of which, though mainly sceptical of contemporary Zionism, pondered the Jewish Question at length, tying it, as Arendt did, to the transformation of the modern State into a totalitarian one. Against this setting, this article examines Schnitzler’s play Professor Bernhardi and Kafka’s unfinished novel The Castle, two contrasting works in which the crisis affecting Jewish assimilation was portrayed alongside an increasingly corrupt apparatus and a world ever more prone to the logic of power.