Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10077/13428
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcPherson, David-
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-20T10:17:20Z-
dc.date.available2016-12-20T10:17:20Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationDavid McPherson, "The Aim of Philosophy: Satisfying Curiosity or Attaining Salvation?", in: "Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2016) XVIII/2", Trieste, EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2016, pp. 291-310it_IT
dc.identifier.issn1825-5167-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10077/13428-
dc.description.abstractIn this essay I begin with remarks made by Bernard Williams that there are two main motives for philosophy, curiosity and salvation, and that he is not ‘into salvation’. I seek to make the case for the claim that philosophy, at its best, should aim at a kind of ‘salvation’. In the first section, I discuss the problematic character of the world that philosophy should aim to address as a matter of seeking a kind of salvation. I identify this as the problem of ‘cosmodicy’, i.e., the problem of how to justify life in the world as meaningful and worthwhile in the face of extensive evil, suffering, disorder, and the like. In the second section, I discuss how Williams’s claim not to be ‘into salvation’ is not entirely accurate. Although he rejects a certain ‘grand’ traditional picture of salvation, he still seeks a more minimal kind insofar as headdresses the problem of cosmodicy. This comes through in his advocacy of ‘humane’ philosophy and in his attempt to support the values that arise for us from within our historically contingent forms of life. I argue here that Williams is wrong to reject the human concern for a larger cosmic significance. In the final section, I discuss two secular attempts to address the issue of cosmic significance: viz., those of Thomas Nagel and Paolo Costa. I also briefly consider here what a theistic perspective has to offer. I conclude by suggesting that if I am right that philosophy, at is best, should aim at a kind of salvation, then this means that the philosophy of religion should have a central place in any philosophy curriculum.it_IT
dc.language.isoenit_IT
dc.publisherEUT Edizioni Università di Trieste-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEtica & Politica / Ethics & Politicsit_IT
dc.relation.ispartofseries(2016) XVIII/2it_IT
dc.subjectPhilosophyit_IT
dc.subjectcosmodicyit_IT
dc.subjectabsurdityit_IT
dc.subjectdisenchantmentit_IT
dc.subjectcomic Enchantmentit_IT
dc.subjectsalvationit_IT
dc.titleThe Aim of Philosophy: Satisfying Curiosity or Attaining Salvation?it_IT
dc.typeBook Chapter-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248-
item.openairetypebookPart-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2016) XVIII/2
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
EP_16.pdf198.17 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record


CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

237
checked on Jan 18, 2021

Download(s) 50

155
checked on Jan 18, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.