Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2016) XVIII/3

Scarica il FullText

CONTENTS / SOMMARIO

Monographica I
COESISTENZE: ETICA, SOCIETÀ E FORME DI VITA


Donatelli Piergiorgio

COEXISTENCES: ETHICS, SOCIETY, AND FORMS OF LIFE. GUEST EDITOR’S PREFACE

Bonito Oliva Rossella

SENSO COMUNE E SENSO DEL COMUNE NELL’ORIZZONTE/MONDO

Botti Caterina

VULNERABILITÀ, RELAZIONI E CURA. RIPENSARE LA BIOETICA

Donatelli Piergiorgio

VULNERABILITÀ E FORME DI VITA

Gagliasso Elena

LONTANI DAL DETERMINISMO: RETI DI RELAZIONI VINCOLATE

Laugier Sandra

CARE, RESPONSIBILITY, AND COEXISTENCE

Petrucciani Stefano

ALIENAZIONE: UN CONCETTO DA RIVISITARE?

Pulcini Elena

ETHICS OF CARE AND EMOTIONS


Monographica II
DELEUZE OGGI. CONTROLLO E DIVENIRE NEL XXI SECOLO


Vignola Paolo

GUEST EDITOR’S PREFACE

Bazzicalupo Laura

ATTUALITA’ POLITICA DI DELEUZE

Brindisi Gianvito

IL TENORE ETICO O MORALE DEL GIUDIZIO. NOTE SU DIRITTO E FILOSOFIA NELLA RIFLESSIONE DI DELEUZE SULLA GIURISPRUDENZA.

Chicchi Federico

CAPITALISMO COME ASSIOMATICA SOCIALE. NOTE A MARGINE SUL CONCETTO DI SFRUTTAMENTO

Galofaro Francesco

SCHIZOFRENIA MECCANICA. COME DE-PROGRAMMARE LE MACCHINE SOCIALI

Treppiedi Fabio

L'AVVENIRE DELLA RESISTENZA. NOTE SULL'IMPENSATO POLITICO

Baranzoni Sara

LE FIGURE DEL CREDERE. MONDO E POSSIBILITÀ POLITICHE CON E OLTRE DELEUZE

Dillet Benoît

NOUS N’AVONS ENCORE RIEN VU… ACCÉLÉRATIONNISME ET DÉCÉLÉRATIONNISME À L’HEURE DE L’AUSTÉRITÉ MONDIALE

Vignola Paolo

NIETZSCHE IN THE AMAZON. FOR A NOMADOLOGY BEYOND ALGORITHMIC GOVERNMENTALITY


Monographica III
IL PESO DEL CORPO SULLA BILANCIA DELLA GIUSTIZIA


Casalini Brunella

THE WEIGHT OF THE BODY ON THE SCALES OF JUSTICE GUEST EDITOR'S PREFACE

Bernardini Maria Giulia

CORPI MUTI: PER UNA CRITICA ALLA PREVALENTE IRRAPPRESENTABILITÀ DEL SOGGETTO-DONNA DISABILE NEL PENSIERO FEMMINISTA

Bourgault Sophie

ATTENTIVE LISTENING AND CARE IN A NEOLIBERAL ERA: WEILIAN INSIGHTS FOR HURRIED TIMES

Pinto Alberto

JUDITH BUTLER E LE POTENZIALITÀ DELLA BODILY POLITICS

Pratesi Alessandro

CITTADINANZA E INCLUSIONE SOCIALE TRA EMOZIONI E PRATICHE DI CURA. IL CASO DEI RIFUGIATI E DEI RICHIEDENTI ASILO IN EUROPA


Symposium
ELVIO BACCARINI, IN A BETTER WORLD? PUBLIC REASON AND BIOTECHNOLOGIES


Moles Andres

NORMATIVITY, EQUAL ACCESS TO BIOTECHNOLOGIES, AND ANTI-PERFECTIONISM

Paulo Norbert

LIBERAL PERSPECTIVES ON MORAL ENHANCEMENT

Cerovac Ivan

LIBERAL EQUALITY, FAIR COOPERATION AND GENETIC ENHANCEMENT

Zelič Nebojša

GENETIC INTERVENTIONS AND JUSTICE

Berčić Boran

GENETIC ENGINEERING AND THE INEQUALITIES

Pellegrino Gianfranco

BETTER HUMANS OR A BETTER WORLD? ON BACCARINI'S VIEW OF PERMISSIBLE ENHANCEMENTS

Malatesti Luca

DISABILITY AND THE SCOPE OF PUBLIC REASON

Baccarini Elvio

CONCESSIVE JUSTICE, PUBLIC REASON, ENHANCEMENT, TREATMENT. REPLIES TO MY CRITICS


Varia


Biasetti Pierfrancesco, De Mori Barbara

A FRAMEWORK OF VALUES: REASONS FOR CONSERVING BIODIVERSITY AND NATURAL ENVIRONMENTS

Block Walter

RESPONSE TO FESER ON LIBERTARIANISM

Menon Marco

LEO STRAUSS AND THE ARGUMENT OF NATURAL THEOLOGY

Zullo Silvia

LE TECNOLOGIE RIPRODUTTIVE DEL FUTURO TRA LIBERTÀ E RESPONSABILITÀ

INFORMATION ON THE JOURNAL

Details


INFORMATION ON THE JOURNAL


Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics is an open access philosophical journal, being published only in an electronic format. The journal aims at promoting research and reflection, both historically and theoretically, in the field of moral and political philosophy, with no cultural preclusion or adhesion to any cultural current. Contributions should be submitted in one of these languages: Italian, English, French, German, Portuguese, Spanish. All essays should include an English abstract of max. 200 words. The editorial staff especially welcomes interdisciplinary contributions with special attention to the main trends of the world of practice. The journal has an anonymous double peer review referee system. Three issues per year are expected. The copyright of the published articles remain to the authors. We ask that in any future use of them Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics be quoted as a source. All products on this site are released with a Creative Commons license (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 IT) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/it/


ETICA & POLITICA / ETHICS & POLITICS POSITION ON PUBLISHING ETHICS

The Editors of Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics have taken every possible measure to ensure the quality of the material here published and, in particular, they guarantee that peer review at their journal is fair, unbiased and timely, and that all papers have been reviewed by unprejudiced and qualified reviewers. The publication of an article through a peer-review process is intended as an essential feature of any serious scientific community. The decision to accept or reject a paper for publication is based on the paper’s relevance, originality and clarity, the study’s validity and its relevance to the mission of the journal. In order to guarantee the quality of the published papers, the Editors encourage reviewers to provide detailed comments to motivate their decisions. The comments will help the Editorial Board to decide the outcome of the paper, and will help to justify this decision to the author. If the paper is accepted with the request of revision, the comments should guide the author in making the revisions for the final manuscript. All material submitted to the journal remains confidential while under review. Once the author receives a positive answer, he/she should send the final version of the article since proofs will not be sent to him/her. E&P will publish the paper within twelve months from the moment of the acceptance, and the author will be informed of the publication. The journal is committed to such standards as originality in research papers, precise references in discussing other scholars’ positions, avoiding plagiarism. E&P takes these standards extremely seriously, because we think that they embody scientific method and are the mark of real scholarly communication. Since Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics is devoted solely to scientific and academic quality, the journal neither has any submission charges nor any article processing charges. The following guidelines are based on existing Elsevier policies and COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors


1. PUBLICATION AND AUTHORSHIP

EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, is the publisher of the peer reviewed international journal Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics. The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed journal is an essential step of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behaviour for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher. Authors need to ensure that the submitted article is the work of the submitting author(s) and is not plagiarized, wholly or in part. They must also make sure that the submitted article is original, is not wholly or in part a re-publication of the author’s earlier work, and contains no fraudulent data. It is also their responsibility to check that all copyrighted material within the article has permission for publication and that material for which the author does not personally hold copyright is not reproduced without permission. Finally, authors should ensure that the manuscript submitted is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.


2. AUTHOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES

Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics is a peer-reviewed journal, and Authors are obliged to participate in our double blind peer review process. Authors must make sure that all and only the contributors to the article are listed as authors. Authors should also ensure that all authors provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.


3. PEER REVIEW AND REVIEWERS’ RESPONSIBILITIES

Both the Referee and the Author remain anonymous throughout the “double blind” review process. Referees are selected according to their expertise in their particular fields. Referees have a responsibility to be objective in their judgments; to have no conflict of interest with respect to the research, with respect to the authors and/or with respect to the research funders; to point out relevant published work which is not yet cited by the author(s); and to treat the reviewed articles confidentially.


4. EDITORIAL RESPONSIBILITIES
Editors hold full authority to reject/accept an article; to accept a paper only when reasonably certain; to promote publication of corrections or retractions when errors are found; to preserve anonymity of reviewers; and to have no conflict of interest with respect to articles they reject/accept. If an Editor feels that there is likely to be a perception of a conflict of interest in relation to their handling of a submission, they will declare it to the other Editors. The other Editors will select referees and make all decisions on the paper.


5. PUBLISHING ETHICS ISSUES

Members of the Editorial Board ensure the monitoring and safeguarding of the publishing ethics. This comprises the strict policy on plagiarism and fraudulent data, the strong commitment to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies when needed, and the strict preclusion of business needs from compromising intellectual and ethical standards. Whenever it is recognized that a published paper contains a significant inaccuracy, misleading statement or distorted report, it will be corrected promptly. If, after an appropriate investigation, an item proves to be fraudulent, it will be retracted. The retraction will be clearly identifiable to readers and indexing systems.



PAST ISSUE AND STATISTICS

Past issues with download and visitors statistics for each article are provided here: http://www.openstarts.units.it/dspace/handle/10077/4673



DIREZIONE / EDITOR:

Riccardo Fanciullacci (Venezia) riccardofanciullacci@libero.it

Pierpaolo Marrone (Trieste) marrone@units.it



REDAZIONE / EDITORIAL BOARD:

Elvio Baccarini (Rijeka) ebaccarini@ffri.hr

Roberto Festa (Trieste) festa@units.it

Giovanni Giorgini (Bologna) giovanni.giorgini@unibo.it

Edoardo Greblo (Trieste) edgreblo@tin.it

Fabio Polidori (Trieste) polidori@units.it



WEBMASTER:

Enrico Marchetto (Trieste) enrico.marchetto@gmail.com


COMITATO SCIENTIFICO NAZIONALE / ITALIAN ADVISORY BOARD:

A. Agnelli † (Trieste), A. Allegra (Perugia), G. Alliney (Macerata), S. Amato (Catania), M. Anzalone (Napoli), D. Ardilli (Modena), F. Aronadio (Roma), G. Azzoni (Pavia), F. Bacchini (Sassari), E. Berti (Padova), M. Bettetini (Milano), P. Bettineschi (Venezia), P. Biasetti (Padova), G. Bistagnino (Milano) R. Caporali (Bologna), A.A. Cassi (Bergamo), G. Catapano (Padova), M. Cossutta (Trieste), L. Cova (Trieste), S. Cremaschi (Vercelli), G. Cevolani (Modena), R. Cristin (Trieste), U. Curi (Padova), G. De Anna (Udine), P. Donatelli (Roma), P. Donini (Milano), M. Faraguna (Milano), M. Ferraris (Torino), L. Floridi (Oxford), R. Frega (Bologna), S. Fuselli (Verona), A. Fussi (Pisa), C. Galli (Bologna), R. Giovagnoli (Roma), P. Kobau (Torino), E. Irrera (Bologna), E. Lecaldano (Roma), L.A. Macor (Oxford), E. Manganaro (Trieste), G. Maniaci (Palermo), R. Martinelli (Trieste), F.G. Menga (Tübingen), R. Mordacci (Milano), V. Morfino (Milano), B. de Mori (Padova), M. Pagano (Vercelli), G. Pellegrino (Roma), V. Rasini (Modena-Reggio Emilia), M. Reichlin (Milano), M. Renzo (Stirling), A. Rigobello (Roma), P.A. Rovatti (Trieste), S. Semplici (Roma), A. Schiavello (Palermo), A. Sciumè (Bergamo), M. Sgarbi (Venezia), F. Toto (Roma), F. Trabattoni (Milano), F. Trifirò (London), M.S. Vaccarezza (Genova), C. Vigna (Venezia), P. Vignola (Guayaquil) S. Zeppi † (Trieste).


COMITATO SCIENTIFICO INTERNAZIONALE / INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY BOARD:

J. Allan (New Zealand), K. Ballestrem (Germany), T. Bedorf (Germany), G. Betz (Germany), W. Block (USA), M. Byron (USA), S. Chambers (Canada), J. Coleman (UK), C. Cowley (Ireland), W. Edelglass (USA), C.L. Geshekter (USA), A. Kalyvas (USA), J. Kelemen (Hungary), F. Klampfer (Slovenia), M. Knoll (Turkey), C. Illies (Germany), D. Innerarity (Spain), A. Lever (Switzerland), H. Lindahl (Netherlands), J. Marti (Spain), M. Matulovic (Croatia), J. McCormick (USA), N. Miscevic (Croatia), A. Moles (Hungary), L. Paulson (France), A. Przylesbski (Poland), J. Quong (USA) V. Rakic (Serbia), A. Schaap (UK), B. Schultz (USA), N. Tarcov (USA), D. Webb (UK), J.P. Zamora Bonilla (Spain).


REFEREES LIST FOR 2017

B. Accarino (Università di Firenze), A. Altobrando (China University of Politics and Law, Pechino) A. Allegra (Università per Stranieri, Perugia), S. Amato (Università di Catania), P. Bettineschi (Università di Padova), S. Blancu (LUMSA, Roma), M. Ballistreri (Università di Torino), M. Bettetini (IULM, Milano), C. Canullo (Università di Macerata), R. Caporali (Università di Bologna), G. Cevolani (IMT, Lucca), F. Ciaramelli (Università di Napoli, Federico II), A. Cislaghi (Università di Trieste), R. Cristin (Università di Trieste), G. De Anna (Università di Udine), P. Donatelli (Università di Roma, La Sapienza), A. Fabris (Università di Pisa), S. Ferrando (Université de Strasbourg), A. Fussi (Università di Pisa), C. Gerbaz (Università di Rijeka), B. Giovanola (Università di Macerata), G. Grandi (Università di Padova), L. Greco (Università di Oxford), M.L. Lanzillo (Università di Bologna), G. Maniaci (Università di Palermo), R. Martinelli (Università di Trieste), F. Menga (Università di Tubinga), F. Miano (Università di Roma, Tor Vergata), M. Monaldi (Università di Trieste), R. Mordacci (Università San Raffaele, Milano), B. De Mori (Università di Padova), G. Pellegrino (LUISS, Roma), U. Pomarici (Università della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”), V. Rasini (Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia), C. Rofena (Università Ca’ Foscari, Venezia), A. Schiavello (Università di Palermo), P. Šustar (Università di Rijeka), M. Trobok (Università di Rijeka), F. Turoldo (Università Ca’ Foscari, Venezia), M. Vaccarezza (Università di Genova), S. Zanardo (Università Europea di Roma).


E&P è indicizzata in / E&P is indexed on

Browse

Recent Submissions

Now showing 1 - 5 of 36
  • Publication
    INFORMATION ON THE JOURNAL
    (EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2016)
      312  180
  • Publication
    LE TECNOLOGIE RIPRODUTTIVE DEL FUTURO TRA LIBERTÀ E RESPONSABILITÀ
    (EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2016)
    Zullo, Silvia
    Scientific and technological development will open new perspectives to the human reproduction, already discussed in the bioethical debate with the advent of in vitro fertilization techniques. From the book by Maurizio Balistreri, entitled The future of human reproduction, we will consider some of the many implications of the so-called reproductive revolution, which can be said to be underway only in part, since in all likelihood we will are going to witness the advance and spread of technologies like cloning, in vitro production of gametes, embryo division by parthenogenesis, ectogenesis, and genetic manipulation. The scenario we can expect to develop should invite us to address from the start the issues it foregrounds, which means revisiting some classic notions, such as those of autonomy and freedom; clarifying some new ones, such as procreative responsibility; and trying to anticipate its social, anthropological, and legal repercussions.
      382  359
  • Publication
    LEO STRAUSS AND THE ARGUMENT OF NATURAL THEOLOGY
    (EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2016)
    Menon, Marco
    In this paper, I analyze the two versions of Leo Straussʼ argument of natural theology, presented respectively in Reason and Revelation (1948, 2007) and The Mutual Influence of Theology and Philosophy (1954, 1979). In both cases, Strauss confronts this argument with major difficulties. On the one hand, with the mysterious character of an all-wise God; on the other hand, with the flawed response of modern science, represented by Spinozaʼs attempt to obtain the system of nature, or the completed account of the whole, which would rule out the possibility of the existence of an omnipotent and unfathomable God. I will try to argue how natural theology may solve this major difficulties, namely by referring to the idea of justice as suggested in Straussʼ An Untitled Lecture on Platoʼs Euthyphron.
      600  457
  • Publication
    RESPONSE TO FESER ON LIBERTARIANISM
    (EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2016)
    Block, Walter
    In Block (2010) I had occasion to criticize Feser (2004). In Feser (2010) he took severe issue with my critique of his earlier work. The present article is my attempt to defend Block (2010) against Feser (2010). What are the issues involved? We disagree on libertarian theory being based upon the non-aggression principle (NAP), and on private property rights predicated upon homesteading. His example of Jones, the air-grabber, I claim is mistaken. Most germane to modern day sensibilities, he protests sharply against my contention that his view toward homosexuals is compatible with those of ISIS: namely, he is in effect calling for the death penalty for this group of people.
      376  318
  • Publication
    A FRAMEWORK OF VALUES: REASONS FOR CONSERVING BIODIVERSITY AND NATURAL ENVIRONMENTS
    (EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2016)
    Biasetti, Pierfrancesco
    ;
    De Mori, Barbara
    The idea that «natural» environments should be protected is a relatively recent one. This new attitude is reflected in the activities of preservation and restoration of natural environments, ecosystems, flora and wildlife that, when scientifically based, can be defined as conservation. In this paper, we would like to examine the framework of values behind these activities. More specifically, we would like to show that there is no single specific reason that can justify conservation in each of its manifestations It is therefore necessary to adopt a complex framework of values, which must be composed carefully, since many of the canonical arguments used to justify conservation provide, when combined together, an incoherent or, at least, incomplete set of reasons. One way to avoid these inconsistencies or incompleteness is, in our view, to adopt, in conjunction with the classic economic and ecological arguments for conservation, a set of arguments appealing to the importance of nature for human flourishing.
      379  534