Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10077/22585
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSmajdor, Annait
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-17T11:53:24Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-17T11:53:24Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationAnna Smajdor, "Your Sperm is Mine! Do Artificial Gametes Change the Ethics of Posthumous Sperm Retrieval and Conception?" in: "Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2018) XX/3", Trieste, EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2018, pp. 53-72it
dc.identifier.issn1825-5167-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10077/22585-
dc.description.abstractA number of cases have arisen over recent decades in which sperm has been extracted from dead and dying men without their prior consent. These extractions are undertaken in order to allow the man's partner to become a mother, or his parents, to become grandparents. Currently, the techniques used to perform such extractions are highly invasive, requiring either the use of an electric probe inserted in the anus to stimulate ejaculation, or surgical removal of all or part of the testicles. However, the development of artificial gametes may make it possible to produce sperm from skin cells, in which case the interventions required are far less invasive. In this paper I consider whether artificial gametes would offer a morally preferable way of producing sperm from dead or dying men without their consent. I evaluate the role played by bodily integrity, and reproductive autonomy in such cases. I suggest that artificial gametes would be less problematic than current techniques. And I argue that concern for reproductive autonomy does not ground a right not to become a parent. Nevertheless, I show that, whatever technique is used in order to derive sperm from dead or dying men, it is rooted in a morally problematic tendency to reify such men. That is, their bodies become the means to achieving the reproductive ends of some third party. Thus, even if sperm could be obtained through minimally invasive techniques, we should still regard such interventions as being a cause for moral concern.it
dc.language.isoenit
dc.publisherEUT Edizioni Università di Triesteit
dc.relation.ispartofEtica & Politica / Ethics & Politicsit
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internazionale*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectArtificial gametesit
dc.subjectPerimortem sperm retrievalit
dc.subjectReproductive autonomyit
dc.subjectReificationit
dc.subjectBodily integrityit
dc.titleYour Sperm is Mine! Do Artificial Gametes Change the Ethics of Posthumous Sperm Retrieval and Conception?it
dc.typeArticleit
dc.identifier.doi10.13137/1825-5167/22585-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypearticle-
Appears in Collections:Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2018) XX/3
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
04_SMAJDOR_53-72.pdf198.58 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record


CORE Recommender

Page view(s) 50

447
checked on Jun 24, 2022

Download(s)

224
checked on Jun 24, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons