Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10077/22637
Title: Kant & the Commons: Understanding Anthropocentrism in Kant’s Philosophy of Right
Authors: Suarez Müller, Fernando
Keywords: KantIdealismCommonsTheory of RightEthicsPrivate PropertyAnthropocentrismTheory of ResponsibilityCommunity
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
Source: Fernando Suarez Müller, "Kant & the Commons: Understanding Anthropocentrism in Kant’s Philosophy of Right" in: "Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2018) XX/3", Trieste, EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2018, pp. 781-814
Journal: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics 
Abstract: 
The idea of a preliminary commons – a sphere of common property prior to private property – is present in Kant’s philosophy of right where, with his theory of natural law, he first makes a move towards a still underdeveloped kind of ‘objective idealism’. But he cannot transform the idea of a preliminary commons into a theory of right that legitimates social institutions or a sphere of positive law because he soon turns back to the subjective idealism of his previous work in which he takes the world to be a transcendental construction of human subjects. Kant’s anthropocentrism and the highlighting of private property are a direct consequence of this subjective transcendentalism. Kant’s return to subjective idealism also makes it impossible for him to conceive a theory of right based on ‘serviceable stewardship’ and ‘responsibility’ rather than on private property. My claim is that in order to pass from a discourse of possession to one of responsibility it is necessary to emphasize and enlarge his theory of natural law which, I argue, tends towards ‘objective idealism’. Such idealism takes ‘objective reason’ to be manifesting itself in the world in an almost Hegelian way – and it is not confined to the subjective consciousness of humans. Things in the world can then be endowed with intrinsic rights. It is a further claim of this paper that a consequent theory of the commons needs this transcendental complement endowing things with intrinsic rights. Alternative positions like naturalism or subjective idealism place objects in a domain ‘beyond right’ condemning nonhuman beings to become merely potential private property. A remodelling of Kantianism would constitute the main layer of a renewed humanism based on an enlarged idea of community and a corresponding idea of responsibility for Being.
Type: Article
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10077/22637
ISSN: 1825-5167
DOI: 10.13137/1825-5167/22637
Rights: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internazionale
Appears in Collections:Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2018) XX/3

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
37_MULLER_781_814.pdf678.37 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record


CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

160
checked on Jun 24, 2022

Download(s)

60
checked on Jun 24, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons