Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
  • Log In
    Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
Repository logo
  • Archive
  • Series/Journals
  • EUT
  • Events
  • Statistics
  • English
  • Italiano
  • Log In
    Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
  3. Periodici
  4. Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics
  5. Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2018) XX/3
  6. Kant & the Commons: Understanding Anthropocentrism in Kant’s Philosophy of Right
 
  • Details
  • Metrics
Options
Kant & the Commons: Understanding Anthropocentrism in Kant’s Philosophy of Right
Suarez Müller, Fernando
2018
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
ISSN
1825-5167
DOI
10.13137/1825-5167/22637
http://hdl.handle.net/10077/22637
  • Article

Abstract
The idea of a preliminary commons – a sphere of common property prior to private property – is present in Kant’s philosophy of right where, with his theory of natural law, he first makes a move towards a still underdeveloped kind of ‘objective idealism’. But he cannot transform the idea of a preliminary commons into a theory of right that legitimates social institutions or a sphere of positive law because he soon turns back to the subjective idealism of his previous work in which he takes the world to be a transcendental construction of human subjects. Kant’s anthropocentrism and the highlighting of private property are a direct consequence of this subjective transcendentalism. Kant’s return to subjective idealism also makes it impossible for him to conceive a theory of right based on ‘serviceable stewardship’ and ‘responsibility’ rather than on private property. My claim is that in order to pass from a discourse of possession to one of responsibility it is necessary to emphasize and enlarge his theory of natural law which, I argue, tends towards ‘objective idealism’. Such idealism takes ‘objective reason’ to be manifesting itself in the world in an almost Hegelian way – and it is not confined to the subjective consciousness of humans. Things in the world can then be endowed with intrinsic rights. It is a further claim of this paper that a consequent theory of the commons needs this transcendental complement endowing things with intrinsic rights. Alternative positions like naturalism or subjective idealism place objects in a domain ‘beyond right’ condemning nonhuman beings to become merely potential private property. A remodelling of Kantianism would constitute the main layer of a renewed humanism based on an enlarged idea of community and a corresponding idea of responsibility for Being.
Journal
Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics 
Subjects
  • Kant

  • Idealism

  • Commons

  • Theory of Right

  • Ethics

  • Private Property

  • Anthropocentrism

  • Theory of Responsibil...

  • Community

Publisher
EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
Source
Fernando Suarez Müller, "Kant & the Commons: Understanding Anthropocentrism in Kant’s Philosophy of Right" in: "Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2018) XX/3", Trieste, EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2018, pp. 781-814
Languages
en
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internazionale
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

37_MULLER_781_814.pdf

Format

Adobe PDF

Size

678.37 KB

Indexed by

 Info

Open Access Policy

Share/Save

 Contacts

EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste

OpenstarTs

 Link

Wiki OpenAcces

Archivio Ricerca ArTS

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback