Options
Čistka kultur? Seveda. Tako kot njihovo svinjanje
Purge of Cultures? Of Course. Same as dirtying them
Javornik, Miha
2019
Loading...
e-ISSN
2283-5482
Abstract
Eden vodilnih ameriško-ruskih
filozofov in kulturologov M. Epštejn
je napisal zanimivo razpravo o pomembnosti
(samo)čiščenja v naravi.
Postavimo si vprašanje: je razmišljanje
mogoče prenesti na kulturo?
Za osnovo nam služi kratki manifest
K. Maleviča Suprematistično zrcalo, saj
pomeni odskočno desko za razmislek
o ponovljivih procesih svinjanja/
omadeževanja in čiščenja v razvoju
kulture. Za ponazorilo in utemeljitev
povedanega sežemo k Malevičevim
sodobnikom: k Vladimirju Vernadskemu
in Dmitriju Čiževskemu. Oba sta
razvila pomembno spoznanje: prvi
o noosferi, drugi o cikličnih sinusoidnih
kulturnih procesih.
One of the leading American-Russian
philosophers and culturologists M.
Epstein has written an interesting discussion
about the importance of (self)
cleaning in nature. We ask ourselves:
can this idea be transferred to culture?
As a starting point, we use the short
manifest of K. Malevich The Suprematist
Mirror, as it represents a stepping
stone for the consideration of repeatable
processes of polluting and
cleaning in the development of culture.
To illustrate the above, we recall Malevich’s
contemporaries: Vladimir Vernadsky
and Dmitry Chizhevsky. Both
developed important insights: the first
on the noosphere, the other on cyclic
sinusoidal cultural processes.
Journal
Slavica Tergestina
Publisher
EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
Source
Miha Javornik, "Čistka kultur? Seveda. Tako kot njihovo svinjanje" in "Slavica Tergestina 22 (2019/I)", Trieste, EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2019, pp. 28-49
Languages
sl
Rights
CC0 1.0 Universal
File(s)