Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10077/24684
Title: Črno na belem, nihilizem brezpredmetnosti
Other Titles: Black on White, Nihilism of Non-Objectivity
Authors: Osojnik, Iztok
Keywords: Suprematizemnihilizemreprezentacijabrezpredmetnostnezavedno (politično, kozmično)performativnostmatematikatehnoznanostSuprematismnihilismrepresentationnon-objectivityunconsciousness (political, cosmic)performativitymathematicstechnoscience
Issue Date: 2019
Publisher: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
Source: Iztok Osojnik, "Black on White, Nihilism of Non-Objectivity" in "Slavica Tergestina 22 (2019/I)", Trieste, EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2019, pp. 70-95
Journal: Slavica Tergestina
Abstract: 
Je mogoče s povezavo Malevičeve slike
Črno na belem in trodimenzionalnimi
obeležji na Ground Zero v New
Yorku (kocka v kocki) kot manifestaciji
militarističnega globalnega nihilizma
problematizirati brezpredmetnost
brezpredmetnosti suprematizma pri
Maleviču? Kaj pomeni molk nereprezentabilnosti?
Nezmožnost reči kaj
o predmetnosti brezpredmetnosti
ali pa zastiranje nihilistične resnice,
ki jo interpretacija/simbolizacija
vzpostavi kot točko nič govorice, prazni
označevalec, falos, na ozadju katerega
se razprejo ideološke manipulacije
in mahinacije sodobne ekonomije?
Je točka nič tisto, čemur Lacan pravi
ekstimnost, tišina Realnega, ki se upira
simbolizaciji, čeprav je tisto, kar uokvirja
simbolno dejanje prej in potem, ali
pa gre za potlačitev, agregat, ki poganja
neoliberalni stroj? Kako na tem ozadju
razpreti vprašanje govorice nezavednega
kot označevalca onkraj simbolizacije,
kako se v to vpiše samovita, zvezdna
beseda Hlebnikova ali brezpredmetnost
Maleviča? Kako brezpredmetnost
problematizirati na ozadju političnega
nezavednega ali v matrikah kozmičnega
nezavednega? Kako v tem razbrati zgodovinsko
usodo (Zahodnega) sveta.

Is it possible by connecting Malevich
painting Black on white to the three-dimensional
monumental squares within
squares at the Ground Zero memorial
park in New York to problematize the
phenomenon of non-objectiveness
of non-objectivity of the suprematism?
What does the silence of the nonrepresentability
expose? Impossibility
to say anything about the non-objectivity,
or does it hide the nihilistic
truth, that a symbolization establishes
as the point zero of language, an empty
signifier, lacanian phalos, on the back
of which the ideological machinations
of the contemporary economy take
place? Is the point zero the point that
Lacan addresses as extymacy, the
silence of the Real that rejects the symbolization
as such, though it frames the
symbolic act before and after, or rather
do we deal with a suppressed aggregate
that runs the neoliberal killing
machine? Is it possible to address the
language of the (political and cosmic)
unconsciousness as the signifier beyond
symbolization, and in what way
the “self-sufficient (samovita) stary
word” of Hlebnikov as well as non-objectivistic
painting by Malevich
fit into that?
Type: Article
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10077/24684
ISSN: 1592-0291
DOI: 10.13137/1592-0291/24684
Rights: CC0 1.0 Universal
Appears in Collections:Slavica Tergestina 22 (2019/I)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
SlavicaTer_22-2019-1_05-Osojnik.pdf198.99 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record


CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

49
checked on Aug 14, 2020

Download(s)

38
checked on Aug 14, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons