Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10077/29363
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPetrov, Petreit
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-16T11:52:09Z-
dc.date.available2019-12-16T11:52:09Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationPetre Petrov, "Tautology as the Highest Form of Ideology: Reflections on Stalinist Discourse (1930-1953)" in: "Words of Power, the Power of Words. The Twentieth-Century Communist Discourse in International Perspective", Trieste, EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2019, pp. 221-237it
dc.identifier.isbn978-88-5511-086-0-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10077/29363-
dc.description.abstractThe chapter takes theoretical aim at the frequent occurrence of tautology in official Stalinist language. My goal is to shed light on a phenomenon that has been inadequately understood in existing scholarship. The tautologies of Soviet ideological discourse have been traditionally interpreted as either showcasing the primitive intellectual level of party scribes or as exemplifying the general irrationalism of totalitarian language. In the scholarly tradition of langue de bois (dereviannyi iazyk, “wooden language”), a propensity for meaningless repetition was seen as one of the ways in which the linguistic medium, mobilized in the service of modern political dictatorships, aids in the disabling of independent rational thought. Against this line of interpretation, the present chapter argues that the tautologies of Stalinist language are something more than mind-numbing nonsense. A certain logic lies behind these seemingly anomalous expressions, and it could give us a key to understanding the character of Stalinist ideology. Slavoj Žižiek’s theory of ideological discourse, with its emphasis on the tautological nature of the master-signifier, and Roland Barthes’s notion of “naturalization” provide the contrasting background for my argument. By analyzing instances of tautology from official Soviet texts, I show that the logic of repetition/redundancy in them is qualitatively different from what these two influential theorizations of ideology have proposed.it
dc.language.isoenit
dc.publisherEUT Edizioni Università di Triesteit
dc.relation.ispartofStudi di Storiait
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internazionale*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleTautology as the Highest Form of Ideology: Reflections on Stalinist Discourse (1930-1953)it
dc.typeBook Chapterit
dc.identifier.eisbn978-88-5511-087-7-
item.openairetypebookPart-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:06 Words of Power, the Power of Words. The Twentieth-Century Communist Discourse in International Perspective
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
09-Petrov_221-237.pdf176.11 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record


CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

93
checked on Aug 15, 2022

Download(s)

125
checked on Aug 15, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons