Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10077/31012
Title: Responses to Critics of Taking Turns with the Earth
Authors: Fritsch, Matthias
Keywords: Intergenerational justiceindigenous philosophyclimate changeearthgiftreciprocityAnthropocene
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
Source: Matthias Fritsch, "Responses to Critics of Taking Turns with the Earth" in: "Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2020) XXII/2", EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, Trieste, 2020, pp. 557-588
Journal: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics 
Abstract: 
This paper responds to five critics (Eva Buddeberg, Scott Marratto, Michael Naas, Janna Thompson, and Jason Wirth) and their commentaries on my Taking Turns with the Earth. Phenomenology, Deconstruction, and Intergenerational Justice (Stanford University Press, 2018). In relation to the book’s argument, my response seeks to clarify and elaborate the role of indigenous philosophies; the meaning and value of the concept of earth; the ontology-ethics interface and the emergence of normativity with birth and death; the practical feasibility and motivational force of the book’s proposals for conceptualizing justice for future generations, namely asymmetrical reciprocity and taking turns; and the role of democratic institutions for justice between generations in view of the global capitalist economy.
Type: Article
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10077/31012
ISSN: 1825-5167
DOI: 10.13137/1825-5167/31012
Rights: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internazionale
Appears in Collections:Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2020) XXII/2

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
31_Fritsch.pdf459.4 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record


CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

93
checked on Jun 28, 2022

Download(s)

25
checked on Jun 28, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons