Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: La massoneria nel senato fascista: dati statistici
Other Titles: Freemasonry in the fascist senate: statistical data
Authors: Fragale, Luca Irwin
Keywords: FreemasonryFascismParliamentSenateStatistics
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
Source: Luca Irwin Fragale, "La massoneria nel senato fascista: dati statistici" in: "QUALESTORIA. Rivista di storia contemporanea. XLVIII, 2, Dicembre 2020", EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, Trieste, 2020, pp. 159-179
Journal: Qualestoria. Rivista di storia contemporanea 
This article illustrates the results of a thorough cross-analysis of two particular archive records: those of Italian Masonry and that of the Senate of the Republic. The range of time taken into account is the first three-year period of the Fascist government, namely from the date of the March on Rome and ending on the proclamation of the law against the associa-tions (November 1925). A detailed and for many aspects unexpected account emerges, from which the real ideological components and their fluctuations come into view. Moreover, such exclusive aspect of the relations between Fascism and Masonry, until now scarcely explored, sheds a more definitive light on the actual or supposed affiliation of such political charac-ters, thanks to the “sifting” intervention carried out first and foremost on the sources of the Grand Orient of Italy’s Historical Archive, as well as on those of the Grand Lodge of Italy, of the State Central Archive and, obviously, of the Senate of the Republic’s Historical Archive.
Type: Article
ISSN: 0393-6082
DOI: 10.13137/0393-6082/31067
Rights: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internazionale
Appears in Collections:48/2 - Qualestoria. Rivista di storia contemporanea. XLVIII, 2, Dicembre 2020

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
09-Fragale.pdf463.51 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

checked on Aug 9, 2022

Download(s) 50

checked on Aug 9, 2022

Google ScholarTM




This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons