Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Hesiod’s Monsters and the Limits of Etymological Signification
Authors: Vergados, Athanassios
Keywords: Hesiodmonstersetymologies
Issue Date: 2021
Publisher: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
Source: Athanassios Vergados, "Hesiod’s Monsters and the Limits of Etymological Signification", Trieste, EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2021, pp. 59-85.
Journal: Incontri di filologia classica 
This paper explores the ways in which the presence of monstrous figures challenges etymologically ‘correct’ naming in Hesiod’s Theogony. By examining the section on the Cyclopes and Hundred-Handers (139-153), the catalogue of monsters (270-336), and the Typhonomachy (820-880), I argue that the Theogony’s monstrous characters call into question the poet’s ability to encapsulate adequately and clearly the hybrid essence of these beings by using a single, ‘correct’ name. Etymological ‘correctness’ increasingly recedes, the names of monsters sometimes capture only part of the nature of these characters, while some characters bear only generic names or no name at all. With the defeat of Typhoeus etymological ‘correctness’ returns to the narrative, thereby suggesting that Zeus’s victory has both a political and a linguistic/cognitive effect.
Type: Article
ISSN: 2464-8752
eISSN: 2464-8760
DOI: 10.13137/2464-8760/32051
Rights: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internazionale
Appears in Collections:19. Incontri di filologia classica (2019-2020)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
4.Vergados.pdf165.74 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

checked on Sep 20, 2021


checked on Sep 20, 2021

Google ScholarTM




This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons