Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10077/5226
Title: | Human Rights: A Modest Proposal | Authors: | Byron, Michael | Keywords: | Human rights; Justification; Pragmatism; Consequentialism; Transcendentalism | Issue Date: | 2009 | Publisher: | EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste | Source: | Michael Byron, "Human Rights: A Modest Proposal", in: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, XI (2009) 1, pp. 470-494. | Series/Report no.: | Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics XI (2009) 1 |
Abstract: | Human rights have become an enormously useful tool in our time, and this for a variety of reasons. Useful, yes: but are rights real? I propose first to examine the most significant philosophical attempts to justify human rights. A universally justified conception of rights I call ‘robust,’ since a successful rational justification would fully underwrite the real existence of rights. Alas, we have no such justification; the second part of my remarks sketches devastating objections to each proposed justification. But all is not lost for rights: a new pragmatic justification for rights talk is available, one that is modest. On the modest view rights are real; but then we should like to know whether rights are as useful as they are on the robust view. Not as useful, no; but a |
Type: | Article | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10077/5226 | ISSN: | 1825-5167 |
Appears in Collections: | Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2009) XI/1 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Byron_E&P_XI_2009_1.pdf | 166.79 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
CORE Recommender
Page view(s) 20
1,188
checked on Jun 3, 2023
Download(s) 50
1,078
checked on Jun 3, 2023
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.