Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10077/5496
Title: Razionalità e relativismo: il significato storico e contemporaneo della risposta hegeliana a Sesto Empirico
Authors: Westphal, Kenneth
Keywords: rationalityrelativismHegelSextus Empiricus
Issue Date: 2002
Publisher: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
Source: Kenneth Westphal, "Razionalità e relativismo: il significato storico e contemporaneo della risposta hegeliana a Sesto Empirico", in: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, IV (2002) 1
Series/Report no.: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics
IV (2002) 1
Abstract: Enlightenment confidence in reason and in our individual powers of reasoning have been subjected to growing criticism. One criticism is that Enlightenment universalism about reason has provided a cover story for cultural if not economic or political imperialism. I identify and criticize three central assumptions about reason common from the Enlightenment to the present day: That reason and tradition are distinct, if not conflicting intellectual resources; that reason is inherently a power of individuals; and that rejecting individualism in epistemology entails historicist relativism. The contemporary debates between defenders of universalist views of reason and their multi-culturalist critics reproduce on an inter-cultural level the contests between Christian religious sects that originally compelled the development in Europe of Enlightenment views of reason. Both sets of debates recapitulate at a practical level the theoretical issues posed by dogmatism and question-begging (petitio principii), problems crystallized in Sextus Empiricus' Dilemma of the Criterion. I contend that rectifying the three erroneous Enlightenment assumptions about reason shows that Sextus' Dilemma can be resolved by a constructive account of self- and mutual criticism. This account provides a constructive response to the contemporary debates between the Enlightenment and its multi-culturalist critics. Surprisingly, the basic views required for a tenable, enlightened account of reason were developed by Hegel, whose views have been widely misunderstood because they have been forced into the very dichotomies against which Hegel argued convincingly.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10077/5496
ISSN: 1825-5167
Appears in Collections:Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2002) IV/1

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Westphal _E&P_IV_2002_1.pdf62.38 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record


CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

1,072
checked on Jul 23, 2018

Download(s)

1,118
checked on Jul 23, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.