Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: In defense of moral rights
Authors: de Mori, Barbara
Keywords: moral rightsnormativity
Issue Date: 2001
Publisher: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
Source: Barbara De Mori, "In defense of moral rights", in: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, III (2001) 1
Series/Report no.: Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics
III (2001) 1
The Universal declaration of 1948 celebrated the belief in human rights as a great moral value. But what does this belief mean exactly? What are human rights precisely? Admitting the existence of human rights may cause difficulties for the moral theories involved and raise many problems. The problem of justification is particularly relevant: are human rights grounded on nature, that is on something unalterable and absolute, or are they the product of history and social life? Different moral theories of human rights give different answers. This paper, therefore, tries to investigate the controversial question of the justification of human rights by comparing the two main positions forwarded in proof of their existence, naturalization and denaturalization, which are developed inside the main moral theories of human rights. After showing the advantages and disadvantages of these rival arguments, some conclusions are drawn that could throw some light on the question of the justification of a concept, such as that of human rights, on which our present social life appears to be intrinsically based.
Type: Article
ISSN: 1825-5167
Appears in Collections:Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics (2001) III/1

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
DeMori_E&P_III_2001_1.pdf64.12 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record

CORE Recommender

Page view(s) 20

checked on Jul 5, 2022

Download(s) 50

checked on Jul 5, 2022

Google ScholarTM


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.