Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: When users of congested roads may view tolls as unjust
Authors: Glazer, Amihai
Niskanen, Esko
Keywords: Congestion tollsUnjust tollsSocial optimum
Issue Date: 2005
Publisher: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste
ISTIEE Istituto per lo studio dei trasporti nell’integrazione economica europea
Source: Amihai Glazer, Esko Niskanen, "When users of congested roads may view tolls as unjust", in: European Transport / Trasporti Europei, XI (2005) 31, pp. 6-14.
Series/Report no.: European Transport / Trasporti Europei
XI (2005) 31
Abstract: Though congestion tolls can increase social welfare, the public often opposes them. One explanation for the opposition is that a road user views a congestion toll as punishment for the damage he causes others. Since a user suffers from congestion, he believes that he has already suffered some punishment and therefore it is unfair or unjust to impose a toll in addition. We assume that a person views a congestion toll as unjust if the toll exceeds the difference between the congestion externality a road user generates on others and the uncompensated externality he suffers from others. We explore the implications of such a view. We illustrate how to determine the toll that satisfies this criterion of justice and how the socially optimal toll violates the criterion. We examine how the just toll varies with the parameters of the model. We discuss the implications of alternative definitions of justice and possible extensions of the basic model considered.
ISSN: 1825-3997
Appears in Collections:European Transport / Trasporti Europei (2005) 31/XI

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Glazer_Niskanen_ET31.pdf160.38 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
checked on Oct 22, 2018


checked on Oct 22, 2018

Google ScholarTM


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.