Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||'Berlin is a skeleton which aches in the cold': the city as fictional autobiography in Christopher Isherwood's "Goodbye to Berlin"||Authors:||Gefter Wondrich, Roberta||Keywords:||Isherwood in Berlin; Berlin in the 30s; Berlin in English literature||Issue Date:||2003||Publisher:||EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste||Source:||Roberta Gefter Wondrich "'Berlin is a skeleton which aches in the cold': the city as fictional autobiography in Christopher Isherwood's "Goodbye to Berlin"", in: Prospero, X (2003), pp. 131-154||Series/Report no.:||Prospero. Rivista di culture anglo-germaniche
|Abstract:||Christopher Isherwood, in his autobiography "Christopher and his Kind", published in 1976, offers a candid version of his bohemian sojourn in Berlin at the beginning of the 20th Century. The author makes clear that his stay was due more to the satisfaction of his sexual desires and less to the gathering of material for his autobiographical novels "Mr Norris Changes Trains" (1935) and "Goodbye to Berlin" (1939). During Isherwood’s stay, Berlin was in the last throes of the Republic of Weimar and at the centre of a cultural and artistic innovation; it was also a place renowned for its sexual freedom, and that was quite appealing to upper class homosexuals. In Berlin, the author could find both inspiration for his works and a personal freedom he could not find at home. Many other writers of the 30s had chosen Berlin as elective site for expatriation, because it was seen as a locus of history in the making, a city of history. Despite this, Isherwood’s "Goodbye to Berlin" is more a novel of the city than a novel about a city. In it, the shared textuality of the urban and the literary is developed along thematic lines that stem from a basic autobiographical matrix: the city as the elected location for the construction of a personal, sexual and ideological identity; the structural identification between the narrating self (also an authorial projection) and the city as body; and, finally, the city as illusion, artifice and cluster of isolated realities, in its turn related to a problematic caesura between individual and community.||URI:||http://hdl.handle.net/10077/7161||ISSN:||1123-2684|
|Appears in Collections:||2003 / 10 Prospero. Rivista di culture anglo-germaniche|
Show full item record
checked on Apr 10, 2019
checked on Apr 10, 2019
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.